几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 10:33 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 enr article on insurance threa

enr article on insurance threat
have any of you read the recent article in enr november 15, 2004? it is titled "structural engineers join to tackle insurance threat".
the frequency of claims is about double for structurals vs. other engineers. last year, the average cost per firm for defense and indemnity of paid claims about $230k was almost 30% higher than other engineers.
since we are such a small part of the insurance business, there may be a future time where we may not be able to buy insurance. i understand case has a committee working with the insurance industry to try to address this issue. some suggestions are better aggressive internal and external management, limitation of liability in contracts, larger fees and self regulation of the profession.
any thoughts?
check out our whitepaper library.
my first thought would be, is this situation any different from years past? the article may make that plain, but your post doesn't. it would certainly be natural that people that designed expensive things would incur more liability than people that didn't, so i don't know that the comparison across different types of engineers really means much. kind of like comparing insurance between, say, a brain surgeon and an allergist.
i just read the article. i think it's just indicative of how litigious our society has become. i would be interested to know what percentage of claims against structurals were actually legitimate. i suspect the lawyers just sue everybody in sight and hope to get the maximum judgement possible. i would also be interested to know how many suits are filed by the structural firm's clients versus outside parties (i.e. the contractor). at this point, i think our only recourse is limited liability clauses and increased fees to pay for the insurance, although i'm not sure a limited liability clause will hold up in court these days. maybe the structural engineer of the future will be single, drives a 10-year old car, has no liability insurance, and lives in an apartment. that way, it's not worth sueing the poor slob.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
could engineering houses affect insurance huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:14 PM
ada, osha and code violations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:09 AM
aashto article 10.24.6.1 - fastener sealing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:19 AM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:05 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多