几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 11:49 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 finite elements

finite elements
this is described in theory of plates. mx, my and mxy are resultant of stresses. for a rectangular plate element, the stresses of mx and my are normal to the orthogonal planes. those of mxy are tangential. how to well make use of them? i think the more simple answer is, through the stresses they represent. in any case there are examples in the books and program manuals dealing in one way or another account this. risa 3d has explanations about in the manual.
yes, agree with ishvaaag. just an simple example to let you visualize the three:
take a sheet of square paper in your hands. if you bend the paper such that it looks like a "u" shaped half barrel; you would be applying a moment to the paper much like mx. my is simply the same think only perpendicular to mx.
now mxy would be represented by you taking your left hand and rotating the left edge of the paper forward and away from you. take your right hand and rotate the paper up and toward you. in other words, one side of the paper is rotating clockwise and the opposite side of the paper is rotating counter-clockwise. this is a kind of twisting moment that is also represented on the near and far edges of the paper at the same time.
what you have to do with your finite element results is add the mx with the mxy at any one point to get the full bending of the elements at that point. also, you add the my moment to the mxy moment as well. sometimes getting the actual mxy and my or mx to add across a surface is difficult. what we sometimes do is go conservative and just add the largest mxy to any mx or my to get a design moment. most times the mxy isn't real big compared to the other two moments.
look up the wood-armer method which takes mx,my and mxy and converts to figures that can be used for reinforcement design (skew or otherwise).
where can i find information about the wood-armer method?
to ernestobarrera
you can go to the following site and you can find a spreadsheet
about woodarmer method :
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
do you ever use solid elements for fea modeling huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:07 PM
concrete slab idealization using beam elements huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:42 PM
【转帖】question about elements from active layou yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-07 12:10 PM
【转帖】finding elements way outside of the drawing extents yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 10:57 AM
【转帖】elements count in oddbsymboltableiterator yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 08:58 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:37 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多