几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 12:45 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 floor joists, header splice, old house

floor joists, header splice, old house
i have come across a strange configuration in my first floor joist layout.
1) the joists on each side of the basement stairwell are not doubled. the stairwell parellels the floor joists.
2) four joists parallel to the stairwell on one side are connected midway to a perpendicular doubled header.
3) the doubled header goes between the (not doubled) joist on the basement stairwell and another not-doubled joist.
4) the full length joists for this part of the structure extend from a center beam, where they are notched and resting on a 2x2 ledger board, to a concrete block outside wall.
5) the spliced joists are also attached to the center beam, are notched and rest on the same 2x2 ledger board. they are attached to the midway header the same way--on both sides--then extend to the same concrete block outside wall.
6) there is a spliced joist next to the single stairwell joist with a poorly constructed supporting (?) wall underneath it, and a wall above it.
7) there is a wall above the midway header, and a wall above the other not-doubled joist, parellel to the stair well.
8) basement floor is concrete slab.
my question: is this structurally sound (i doubt it), and what is the best way to resolve the situation without putting a second full length supporting wall.
thank you.
check out our whitepaper library.
further information about span, joist size, floor deck, joist species (if known) is required to answer your questions.
floor decking is 1/2" plywood (1970 era)
full length joists are 15'10" x (2" x 10")
sliced joist are divided midway @7'10"
joist spacing from stairwell is:
full joist @ 0", 6', 6'6", 7'10", 8'2", then 16" oc.
spliced joists are sistered to full joists at 0" and 6'.
spliced joists are also at: 1'0", 2'0", 3'4" and 4'8"
joists are white pine (wp)3 the stamp also says 9-dry and eagle lake.
it doesn't sound safe because the splices joists do not appear to have a means to transfer tension across the splice. actually, this is hardly called a splice, so much as joists bearing on a transfer beam.
two solutions, both requiring some analysis, would be :
put columns below each end of the double header.pretty simple. can you stand the columns? will the columns crack the slab.
scab a piece of plywood to the bottom of the cut(or spliced) joists to transfer the tension across them. more difficult, but no loss of floor space. you'll need to shore up the whole area prior to nailing on the plywood. is there a means of shear transfer? what is the nailing req'd to transfer the tension?
i personally favor the 2nd. but them, i'm an engineer and enjoy that type of analysis.
would i assume that the double header (transfer beam) is a cantilever beam to make the calculation?
the load for the 6' x 16' section 14 psf dead + 40 psf residential code live load (54psf total).
would the plywood be 8' x 3' in two sections, with 1/8" expansion space? i'm not sure how the load transfer would occur across the "double header".
nailing would be calculated for shear in the same manner as a shear wall?
thank you in advance.
it sounded like the dbl header is simple span from the first post. what would it be cantilevering over? do you expect much expansion over a 6 foot width of floor? if not, then probably a single piece would suffice.
the plywood would only need to be long enough to transfer the tension forces. this will be dictated by the nailing requirements.
nail calculations would be similar to that of a shear wall in regards to mode of failure /nail strength. the tension forces would be approximate wl^2/8 *[12]/d(of the joist). remember the nails will actually be in shear, not tension. the allowable tension will need to be checked for the plywood. be conservative. the moment arm will actually be less the the depth of the joist, since compression (to counter the tension) will occur over a depth near the top of the joist.
this will of course result in higher tension/compression forces.
_________ __________<---subfloor above
| |
| | <--joists(dbl hdr between
_________| |__________ joists)
___________________
^------plywood
maybe this limited sketch will help.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
deck header huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:33 PM
damaged field splice on steel bridge girder huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:23 PM
beam splice deflection question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:02 PM
another thread on lap splice length in cmu huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:17 PM
【转帖】header filename confliction yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 12:02 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:56 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多