几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 12:52 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 floor vibration--no concrete

floor vibration--no concrete
i am designing a second floor "beer garden" as part of a restaurant project. the floor system consists of type b deck on open web joists, without concrete topping. there will be rigid insulation on top of the deck, and 2" concrete pavers on top of the insulation.
i intend to check vibration, and use the noncomposite section properties (again, no concrete) for the joists and beams. does that make sense? anyone else ever dealt with this?
daveatkins
seems to me, this is not much different than a roof with pavers. roofs can be bouncy since there is little mass and little damping. your analysis approach sounds logical but i would guess that the owner won't be happy with the potential movement.
just out of curosity, is this outside? if so, i assume there will be a membrane and drains similar to a roof.
jike,
yes, it is outside, and yes, it is essentially a roof with pavers.
i plan to beef up the beams and joists to make the vibration check out. my fear is that it will be difficult, since the conrete topping contributes so much to the stiffness of the system.
i may end up adding concrete topping, just for stiffness.
daveatkins
it has been a while since i did a vibration check, but am i correct in saying that you need to check the frequency as well as the acceleration?
the frequency may be problematic because of the lack of stiffness (not having composite concrete topping, not to mention open web joists are generally less stiff than wf).
i suspect the acceleration will also be a problem because there is little mass, so when you do the footfall check the acceleration will be higher than if you had concrete topping. the pavers should help somewhat, but not like a concrete topping.
dave, i think you are right on, the sections will be noncomposite and it will be difficult to meet the thomas murray vibration criteria.
you should alert the owner/architect of the potential problem.
the concrete pavers will only help with the effective weight (w) of the joist panel.
we have added sand bags to joists to help dampen the vibration when it has been perceived to be a problem.
dave,
i have done designs where steel beams support only timber joists with similar loading and we have beeen able to make them work. in this case you have the 2" concrete pavers to provide some weight to help keep it down.
the floor to ceiling depth will be much higher than the composite floor though.
this will be one of those cases where you design for vibration and check for strength afterwards.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
concrete sampling guidlines huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:34 PM
concrete roof slab load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:34 PM
concrete mix= reinfocing for exterior composit deck huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:19 PM
concrete corrosion in partial saturated condition huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:54 AM
chapter 4 preliminary design properties of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:47 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多