几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 01:27 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 foundation design of a light pole

foundation design of a light pole
i would like to know of any good method to design a light pole 14' heigh over ground surface, 17" bottom diameter, and subject to a wind force of 392lb located at 11' over the ground surface. do you know of any text book that contains good design examples of similar topics. uplift design on foundation and overturning due to wind forces.
thanks

check out our whitepaper library.
lina...there are several ways you can approach the foundation for this. it can be a square foundation with two considerations:
(1)mass to resist overturning
(2)reinforcement for bending
--or--
it can be a small drilled pier foundation designed for the same parameters.
based on the base size, a 30 or 36 inch diameter pier would be necessary, with the length determined by the necessary fixity to resist the moment at the base and obtaining enough soil resistance (shear through dual projected planes as rotation would theoretically occur).
for the square foundation, not much dependence on soil type as long as you have reasonable bearing capacity (1500 psf or better). with the drilled pier, the resistance to overturning and thus the length of the pier is dependent upon soil conditions.
the vertical loads on either are essentially negligible, but don't forget to include the mass of the concrete. the pier can be designed as a column, but again, you have to determine the fixity of the system.
lina:
most textbooks are painfully devoid of this subject, but there are several papers published concerning the overturning resistance of poles directly buried in sand or clay. many of them are quite old, however, and may not be readily available. here is a partial listing:
. a highway research board (washington dc) bulletin 247 that appeared in 1959.
. asce journal of soil mechanics, may, 1964 & 1965 by b.b. broms.
. matlock, hudson & reese: asce journal of soil mechanics in october 1960.
. timber construction manual 1994, american institute of timber construction.
. an excellent asce paper by naik & peyrot, 1976 on "analysis and design of laterally loaded piles."
there are others as well which i can share with you if you need them.
the polecat

we use couple of methods for designing posts, typically used as sign standards. i've set them up as mathcad files.
the first (embedment of poles, sheeting and anchor piles, m.a. drucker, civil engineering, dec 1934)
max passive pressure at base:
k = kp * gammas * w / 1000, where kp - coef of passive soil pressure, gammas - weight of soil(pcf), w - width of embedded post(ft)
y = ((k - h^2) - 2 * f)^2 / (k - h^3 - 6 * f * l), where h - height of post, f - horiz. force at top of pole, l - total length of post
max permissible soil pressure at base; pmax = k * h
max soil pressure at base; pbase = y - pmax
point of max soil pressure at top; ht = (k * h^2 - 2 * f) / y; ht = if (pbase <= 0,0,pbase)
max soil pressure at top ptop = k * (h - ht); ptop = if (pbase <= 0,0,ptop)
the second method if from civil engineering handbook by urquhart, 1940
pmax = k * h; where k and h are as above
pbase = (12 * f * h)/(h^2 * w) + (6 * f)/(h * w); pbase = if(pbase <= 0,0,pbase), where f, h, and w are as above
b = (pbase * w * h^2) / (3 * (2 * f + pbase * w * h))
point of max soil pressure at top; a = h - b, ht = h - (a / 2)
max soil pressure at top; (a^2 * pbase)/(4 * b * h)
for more significant structures, i use a set of reese and matlock tables that are excellent, albeit, old...
lina,
another reference that you may want to check out is aashto's "standard specifications for structural supports for highway signs, luminaries and traffic signals". section 8 deals briefly with foundations and contains a chart (figure 1.8.2c(4)) titled "embedment of posts with overturning loads".
matt
i'm with matt (breaks) on this one. aside from the simple statics of the problem, the best reference i've seen on the subject is the reference noted by breaks.
the ubc has information on overturning with pier foundations.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
foundation design for settlemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:27 PM
footing foundation design reference huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:03 PM
dots requiring pe stamps on shop drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:18 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:49 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多