几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 05:41 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 how to control moments

how to control moments
hi,
i am designing a workshop building which his 24m wide x 66m long x 18m high. it has got a crane at 11m level having a cap of 30t.
i have braced frame in long dir and moment frame in transv dir. now i am getting huge moment in trans dir due to wind. although i have considered 50% cap of crane with wind. is there any other fact which should be applied while considering wind & crane load together. and any other way to control thismoment except providing 1500mm long base plate whic huge anchor bolt size.
thanks in advance for your efforts in understanding my problem.
check out our whitepaper library.
shbh,
what country are you in? what code are you using?
if you model the bases as fully fixed then you are always going to get a large base moment.
i tend to model portal frame bases as partially fixed under wind load and pinned under strength state as this tends to get a better result.
you could put a column under the crane beam instead of a corbel?
csd72,
the building is in chile, and asce-7 is the code for loading.
but how u can assume fixed in strength case and pinned in wind case. it has to be either pinned ir fixed irrespective to the lrfd or asd load cases.
i have checked this model with pinned base (rafters have moment connection with columns) but deflection are too high to be acceptable.
this is a steel building and i have w30x116 below crane girder , above which this column reduces to w16x100. thus crane girder is approx 300mm eccentric to the column w30x116. this i have included by applying additional moment where ever i am applying crane load on the column.
i think csd72 is saying that using that method just gives a little closer answer to reality than "fixed" or "pinned" since neither one can be truly realized.
we do this at my firm with type ii connections with wind. we design the beam as pinned-pinned for gravity and design the beam and connection as fixed fixed for wind.
use a truss to span the short direction with rigid moment connections at both top and bottom of truss to deep column or double column laced together on one large baseplate.
the concept with type ii wind connections is a completely different situation then that with column base plates. with type ii connections, you are simply allowing the gravity load to fabricate the top and bottom angles to the correct end rotation for a simple span beam. therefore, there is no gravity end moment.
shbh:
let me give a hint here. i hope it helps.
moment is a function of stiffness.
shbh,
i can see the confusion if you are using asd under asce7 as the strength design and serviceability design are taken as the same.
if you use lrfd then the two are different loadings (ones factored the other isnt) and you can therefore justify that a connection is strong (and stiff) enough to act like a fixed connection under service loads but will yield and act more like a pinned connection at factored loads.
basically it should remain undamaged at service loads but it just has to stand up at strength loads.
to find out how much strength you need for partial fixity:
1. make up an additional load case with pinned supports and a 10kn.m noment applied at each support (in the same direction).
2. measure what the deflection is from this.
3. by principal of superposition: required partial fixity = 10kn.m x(actual deflection - allowable defl.)/(deflection from 10kn.m moments)
4. limit the fixity moment to about 50 or 60 kn.m or the fully fixed condition, whichever is the lesser.
5. design the base plate and bolts as fully fixed under this moment. put the bolts inside the flanges, but as far apart as possible to give the service load moment capacity.
re
csd72
i think this makes sense. but is it necessary to keep the bolts inside the flange, as i am having bracings at this location (bracings are near to the outer flange of the column).
swearingen: i have modelled full structure. and have plan bracings at the roof level.
yes you can put the bolts outside the flange. make sure tha base plate can take the bending under service loads (i wouldnt put any stiffeners as this would make it too stiff).
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
control joint in structural slab on voidform huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:44 PM
interface control dwgs huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 11:24 AM
【转帖】interface control dwgs yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 08:33 PM
【转帖】vista and activex control yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-13 03:19 PM
【转帖】how to create activex control in vb.net for use in tab via addcontrol3 yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-12 09:14 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:09 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多