几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 06:52 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ibc seismic eqn 16-28

ibc seismic: eqn 16-28
hello all,
in the ibc 2000 code, equation 16-28 states that
e = p*qe + 0.2*sds*d
i am confused about the 0.2*sds*d part of the equuation. what is this part trying to represent? if i have a mezzanine that has a high dead load, would this be included in the "d" part of the above equation?
how and when are gravity loads additive to seismic loads?
any insight you have would be much appreciated.
thanks,
js.
per sect 1602 notations, d = dead load, e = combined effect of horizontal and vertical earthquake-induced forces. first term in equations 16-28 and 16-29 are horizontal component of e, second term is vertical component. e is to be combined with other load effects per load combinations in sect 1605. if using, say strengh/lrfd combinations of 1605.2, e per eqn 16-28 is used for load combo 16-5 (effects of gravity and seismic ground motion additive per 1617.1.1), and e per eqn 16-29 is used for load combo 16-6 (effects of gravity and seismic ground motion counteract). note that when these eqns for e are substituted into their respective load combos, load combo eqns may be re-written to combine d terms: for 16-5, (1.2+0.2*sds)*d; for 16-6, (0.9-0.2*sds)*d.
hope this helps
if you have a column in a frame for instance, there would be a force in the column from the couple due to an applied horizontal seismic force.
there is also an axial force 0.2sdsxd (vertical acceleration)to be added to the above mentioned column in compression. (d is the dead load supported by the column, including itself). you still have to add in the normally supported dead load per load comb. (ie 1.0d, 0.9d etc).
please refer to my answer to this question in this previous post:
jae,
thank you for the link to your previous thread. i am still not sure how this would apply to my current situation. i am designing the sidewall bracing for a building in high seismic region. using your example, how would i calculate the brace force in each bay? would the "d" in eqn. 16-28 refer only to the dead load in the particular
as i said in the previous thread - it helps to keep in mind that the load combination are combinations of effects - not combinations of directional loads.
so the 0.9d + e/1.4 is a combination of all the dead and seismic loads on your structure. the dead load effect that is within e (since e is the lateral force on the structure plus a percentage of the dead load) is an added portion of the dead load.
so you would have the following included in the above combination:
0.9 x d
(0.2 x sds x d)/1.4
(lateral seismic)/1.4
you are never adding vertical loads numerically to lateral loads, rather, in this combination you are including vertical and horizontal loads in combination in one analysis with the applicable factors (0.9, 1/1.4, etc) applied.
hope this helps.
thanks again, i think i am beginning to understand this.
let's say that the eqn 16-28 is more of a "load combination" than an actual equation. so in the case of seismic bracing along the sidewalls (perpendicular to the frame) the brace would only resist the lateral effect of the load since the brace does not carry any dead load.
in the direction paralllel to the frame however, the frame would not only resist the lateral force but it would also have to resist the additional 0.2*sds*d dead load effect along with the lateral effect. in short, the load combination
0.9d + e/1.4
could be replaced with
0.9d + ((p*qe)/1.4) + ((0.2*sds*d)/1.4)
which simplifies to
(0.9 + .143*sds)*d + (lateral seismic)/1.4fff">
so the 0.2*sds*dfff"> is actually only affecting the amount of vertical dead load applied to the
i think you've got it.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
ibc seismic effect e huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:52 PM
ibc 2003 1605.4 special seismic combinations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:42 PM
ibc 2000 seismic forces - whatis component operating weigh huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:40 PM
ibc 2000 - seismic-force-resisting system huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:38 PM
2003 ibc seismic - troubleshooting huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:27 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:31 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多