几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 10:46 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 liquor warehouse live load

liquor warehouse live load....
alrighty, now that i've got your attention!
seems to be a little disagreement between the architects and the engineers. arch. propose a mezzanine for a liquor store is 125 psf, and us engineers think 250psf is the more appropriate live load.
i've calculated that 12oz. beer cans (full) per cubic foot weigh 42 pcf. stacked 8 feet high is 336 psf. obviously you cant stack cases of beer solid on a mezzanine - you need pathways to access this beer. so it would seem that the 250 psf would be appropriate.
a penny for your thoughts.
ibc table 1607.1 calls for 125 psf for light storage and 250 psf for heavy storage, but it also states "shall be designed for heavier loads if required for anticipated storage".
that shouldn't even be an argument. i would start at 250 and go up if necessary.
the 250 psf is the way to go. what do architects know. just kidding.. not... lol
the heavy liquid adds up in hurry! i would figure the height of the shelf and how much liquor can be stacked. then i would use density of water to compute total weight. then i would divide by mezzanine area and she what you come up. i would use the heaviest load which is conservative.
regards,
lutfi
while all of our codes usually deal with a uniform live load across a floor, keep in mind that they also provide for smaller concentrated loads. in your case, you've correctly done some calculations to get a handle on what you really have as far as weight.
i would go a few steps further:
1. be sure in your calculation of 336 psf that you account for pallet spaces, rack legs causing gaps in the product, etc. - otherwise you are way too conservative.
2. determine a two-tiered approach. directly under the product you will have the heaviest weight. in the aisles you will have product plus whatever moves that product plus the guy moving the product. the larger support
a side issue perhaps, but what is the structural system? composite framing would be convenient because the composite flexural strength and stiffness are often overkill by very large margins. in other words, you might not need much extra to get your upper-end load of 336 psf, relieving your need to spend more time thinking about this.
now where's my penny?
14159
i'd be inclined to go 250psf or higher.
what happens when they stock up for christmas and decide to just pack the whole area solidly? or use it for temporary storage the day a big load gets delivered.
also depending on the structural system, don't forget that the worst loading situation can be when every second bay is loaded.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
green roof live load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:09 PM
forklift load on structural floor huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:17 PM
existing steel column analysis huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 08:59 AM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
100 or 100 = 25 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:27 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:54 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多