几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 03:25 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 multi cell circular concrete structure

multi cell circular concrete structure
we are considering taking on a project that involves the design of a multi-cell circular concrete structure, specifically a combined digester and settling basin. the chambers are separated by concrete slab, which has a hole in the middle through which a shaft passes that drives scrapers. the diameter is about 40 feet, the overall height is about 30 feet, with the slab located about 10 feet down from the top. i have checked the pca document for the design of circular concrete tanks, but the slab with the hole seems to put this structure beyond the scope of the pca book.
my question: is anyone aware of a design guide for a structure as described above? i have contaced pca and have not heard back from them yet. aci 350 doesn't give any design aids for the design of environmental structures.

?does one chamber sit abover the other? would the slab at 10' depth be supported by the claifier ring only or have column supports below? if supported by the ring it probably will be a circular plate/fixed end conditions.
have done similar but with rectangular configuration, or single circular only.
best, tincan
one chamber sits above the other, and the slab is only supported at the exterior wall of the vessel. my problem is that at the moment i don't know how to accurately analyze a circular slab with a 4 foot diameter hole in the middle, and i don't want to try to model it on computer without knowing how to do it by hand. i figure the fixed end moment at the perimeter of the slab could be resolved in the tank wall with a compression ring at the slab bearing and a tension ring at the base of the tank wall.
check "formulas for stress and strain", which does have formulas for circular plates with holes, also cylindrical shells. it will get a bit involved tying the two together (ie, analyzing the two together). you will have tension at the interface (from expansion of the wall) as well as shear and moment.
i assume you mean that the lower chamber could be empty while the upper chamber was full, which of course puts substantial loads on the slab (and on the footing under the shell). if operating conditions were such that both chambers would always be filled, the only load would be the dead weight of the slab, which shouldn't be hard to support.
in the steel tank business, we periodically get inquiries from people that want to divide tanks, either with a diaphram across as you indicate, or with an inner and outer tank, or with a vertical divider. in all cases, it estimates out cheaper to build two separate tanks. in the case of concrete, i think the inner-outer annular tanks would work okay, but otherwise, i'd suggest comparing cost to two separate tanks as an option. unless, as mentioned, the chambers are maintained full at all times.
a 4' diameter hole would be akin to a hatch or mh lid. i think pca has something on circular caps for. will check and reply.
tincan
check pca (portland cement assn.) for a bulletin on "circular concrete tanks" they give the radial and tangential moment coefficients for moments in a circular slab without center support. don't have the exact title, mine has been misplaced/borrowed. however, the coefficients are:
point
0.0r 0.1r 0.2r 0.3r 0.4r 0.5r 0.6r 0.7r 0.8r 0.9r 1.0r
radial moment mr
.075 .073 .067 .077 .043 .025 .003 -.023 -.053 -.087 -.125
tangential moment mt
.075 .074 .071 .066 .059 .050 .039 .026 .011 -.006 -.025
moment = coeff x pr^2 (p = uniform loading)
+sign denotes compression in surface loaded.
0.0r denotes center of slab,
best, tincan
thanks tincan. i contacted the pca, but they have not gotten back to me yet. i am concerned about the effect of the hole in the middle of the slab. roark's formulas for stress and strain does consider circular slabs with holes in them, but i don't think that concrete meets the assumptions that the formulas are based on. i'm thinking that we might pass on this project.
note that the above is for a slab without a hole in it. case 10b, table 24, in the 5th edition of "formulas for stress and strain".
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
concrete sampling guidlines huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:34 PM
concrete mix= reinfocing for exterior composit deck huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:19 PM
chapter 4 preliminary design properties of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 PM
【转帖】哪位高手指点一下下边lisp的怎么用 yang686526 数据库ObjectDBX 0 2009-04-28 12:13 PM
哪位高手指点一下下边lisp的怎么用 yang686526 ObjectARX(AutoLISP) 0 2009-04-26 06:19 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:24 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多