几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 11:02 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 outriggers on joist roof

outriggers on joist roof
doing a school with steel joist roof and cmu bearing walls. the building has a 4 ft roof overhang all around. i'm using joist extensions on the side perpendicular to joists. my question is on the sides parallel to joists. i've never used the loose outriggers from the joist mfg. cuz they say they aren't u.l. approved and i've always solved it some other way. this job has no simple solutions in that the spans are long and the allowable structure depth inside the eave/overhang is very limited, so the outriggers would be ideal.
2 questions:
anybody used the outriggers and what was your experience? is it still true that the outriggers are not u.l. approved?
tw
check out our whitepaper library.
you can use outriggers with a moment connection with suppoerting beams on either side and continue it to the joist so that it will balance torsional moment of the overhang portion. you might need this close to the location of joist bridging.
when i use outriggers, i almost exclusively use hss 1.1/2 or 2.1/2. i can't truly state the ul rating of hss though.
who are the joist manufacturers and what type of outriggers are you referring to ? have you got purlins which can be extended on the side?
the vulcraft 2.5k series. i have substantial (44lh10 and the like) joists/trusses running parallel w/ exterior cmu wall, similar condition to what is shown in vulcraft catalog for what outriggers are for. but the u.l. thing is a show-killer i believe.
tw
we've used the vulcraft extensions. no problems. don't know why you say a u.l. rating is required per code.
i agree. i have done many jobs with outriggers that have never required a ul rating.
your biggest problem with a 4 foot overhang will be uplift on the 1st interior member. you may need a moment connection there and extend back to the 2nd interior
yes.
the biggest issue we had was that the architect wanted to slope the roof (1/4" per foot) and they wanted the outriggers wanted to be level... can't have both.
so we had to make the structure level and use tapered insulation to get the roof slope.
jae:
we have had the same request multiple times also. we have achieved this with varying steel heights to get the edge level but it is not an easy thing to accomplish.
why do you need ul approval?
the roof is ul rated by the architect, i thought. turns out it is not so this has just been a little ado about nothing. thanks for the replies.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
low slope roof construction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:50 AM
gypsum roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:37 PM
flat roof repairs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:23 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM
a flat roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:05 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:57 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多