几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 11:27 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 parking garage live load

parking garage live load
what live load is being used on parking garage design today? 40 or 50 psf?
check out our whitepaper library.
depends on which code you are using.
ibc 2006 = 40psf
asce 7-05 = 40psf
ibc 2003 = 50psf
asce 7-02 = i can't find this code right now but i believe it is 50psf as well.
note that you still have to consider all applicable point loads contained within your specific code.

under ibc 2006:
- for garages with passenger vehicles only use 40 psf or the concentrated load noted in footnote 'a' of table 1607.1
- 50 psf for garages with bus or truck traffic.
for the engineers with garage design experience have you lowered your design live load criteria from 50 psf to 40 psf?
ibc 2000 was 50 psf unreducible (1607.9.1.2)
ibc 2003/2006 is 40 psf unreducible (1607.9.1.2) but the concentrated load requirements changed.

check out the "2nd story car showroom" thread. there is an article about live loads on parking garages involving some thorough research for the states as well as vehicle weight trends.
to answer your question specifically, when i was designing parking garages all the time, i used the 40 psf and reduced the column loads as allowed by code. none of my garages have failed yet.
as for point loads, i have seen an unsupported corner of a precast doubletee fail under the 3,000 lbs test load.
i usually added 2 psf for mechanical loads.
mauleflyer:
not yet, though we have only done a couple of garages since our local city adopted ibc 2006. it had been on ibc 2000 up until january of this year.
i'm sure, sooner or later, we will get called on this by the precast or post-tension supplier, then we will get pushed to go to 40 psf.
clarification - alternate live load reduction under the old boca code allowed for load reductions down to 40 psf and i believe even below that. something like a 40% max reduction off of the 50 psf live load based on tributary area. not talking about the latest ibc.
this is a good discussion on the progression of parking deck live loads and parking deck live load reduction requirements from ibc 2000, 2003, to ibc 2006:
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
parking garage live load 2 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:27 AM
parking garage - live loads and live load reductions huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:26 AM
nbc 2005 parking garage live load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 03:43 PM
live load reduction two way slabs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:51 AM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:15 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多