几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 11:34 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 partical moment connection

partical moment connection
i have modeled a basic steel moment frame. the fabricator has shown a bolted angle at top and btm of the beam. i figure this to be about 60% of fixed. i cannot model partial moment connections in the software i have.
i am trying to determine the negative effects this would have on my frame, since it was modeled at 100% fixed. what comes to mind is increased deflection and p-delta effects.
what is the best way to figure the effects for partial fixity connections in frames?

depending on configuration and stiffness ratio of beam-to-column, you can expect the fixed condition to yield a moment at the connnection of somewhere between wl^2/12 and wl^2/15 (possibly a bit lower, but not much) for reasonable span ratios. the variation between these values and a 60 percent value will have the effects you mentioned, but if you bracket those in hand calcs, you might find they are insignificant. the effect will be greater in the
normally we bother about end-moments in moment frames. with partially released moments at ends, the mid-span moments will go up and sections will need a check at mid-span too.
what about for estimating the decrease in joint stiffness for the lateral design of the frame. i would imagine that some programs allow internal springs that would help account for partial fixity, but i do not have this available.

i am concerned about the increase in story drift i will now have.
if your software doesn't directly allow for partial restraint connections, the only other "trick" you can do is set a joint a small distance from the beam/column intersection joint (perhaps 6" away) and for the small 6" beam length, enter a smaller beam with lower ix.
how much lower ix is the tough part. you could do some hand calculations to get an estimate on the moment/rotation of the joint and somehow equate that to a flexural stiffness in the short section.
in any case, the less-stiff mini-beam would at least approach the exact solution and create a frame with less stiffness than your original fixed frame.
jae, i am using risa 3d, are there any other tricks you know of for modeling pr connections in this program?
fema 356 section 5.5.3 provides a simplified method for adjusting frame stiffness to account for partially restrained connections.
for bare steel pr connections:
rotational stiffness, k = mce/0.005
where mce is the expected moment strength of the connection.
then, the adjusted stiffness of the beam is:
eiadjusted = 1/(6h/(l^2*k)+1/(ei))
see fema 356 for more info.
when you consider that a beam is connected to a column, and that the column is not entirely rigid itself, then no matter how stiff the connection, the beam end will never be entirely 'fixed'.
if you accept that, you may consider that your beam end connection provides say 60% of full fixed end moment(fem) for the beam; is the applied moment (at the beam end) as determined by your analysis, greater or less than the 60% (say)of fem?? if the applied moment is less than the 60%, then as far as that beam is concerned in that structure, its end is fixed.
hope these are helpful thoughts.
so i need to check that the moment capacity of the connection (at 60% of fixed) is actually greater than the moment that is required (if was completely rigid).
in other words, 60% of the capacity of the connection has got to be greater than the 100% fixed moment required.
(sorry i'm new to pr connections.)
jae's suggestion will work. since you designed it as fully fixed, i would choose a beam for the short section that had a moment capacity of the 60%. i would also use a really short section, say 6", to imitate the connection. (oh, crap!!! did i just say 6" was really short?? dammit, i've judged myself again!). the pia of it is splitting each of those beams to meet your condition. to be accurate, you'd have to apply it to all of those beams, not just the worst one. it has to redistribute the stiffness matrix taking all those connections into account. i think the end restraints stay with the member too, so if your fixed on one end, and pinned on the other, once you divide your member, the original
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
connection moment capacity huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:14 PM
cantilever steel beam at column huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:40 PM
beams shear splices vs. moment splices huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:13 PM
beam to beam moment connection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:07 PM
aisc 13th ed. and cjp dw moment connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:27 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:12 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多