几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 12:17 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 piers

piers
we have two different philosphies in our office as to whether we should draw concrete piers or to schedule them.
any thoughts?
find a job or post a job opening
depends on the type of project and whether there are a lot of revisions. client may also have a requirement. a 'hard and fast' rule may not be practical. it's often easier to modify a schedule than to modify notes on a plan if there are a lot of revisions or a lot of common pier types. you can still have p-1 typ u/n for both plan notes and schedule and the pier type can be referenced in a foundation schedule. as a personal preference, i prefer plan notes unless the project becomes 'larger', then a schedule... the pier schedule can reference typical cross-sections as reqd.
dik
i always try to use notes and schedules, instead of drawing details, because i have found this to be more efficient. i use details when something can't be explained with notes or schedules.
daveatkins
i think it depends on who will be using the drawings. our office normally provides individual detail drawings for each pier with rebar details as often the user needs and wants that level of information. i have had clients that were used to working from schedules and that is the way their people wanted it. i think the schedules are more efficient for a designer to prepare, but they are not there for my benefit, they are there for the guy who has to build it.
we have used both ways. we have had some projects where we have used a schedule and the contractor did not know how to layout the piers so he wanted us to provide details of each. we have had many others jobs where a schedule was sufficient.
if a project does not have more then 2 or 3 piers, they can be put in the notes instead of providing a schedule.
i have worked on several large projects that were designed and constructed on the "fast track". scheduling numerous piers was an advantage:
1. it allowed both design & issue of bid documents to expedited.
2. it gave bidders specific quantities of concrete, rebar & anchor bolts to include in their pricing.
3. cost control - as the owner, we knew to expect change orders anyway. at least we had a base bid for each pier, even if it's design changed significantly.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
is it ok to pour piers without use of a vibrator huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 09:29 PM
helical piers huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 04:06 PM
helical piers for swimming pools huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 04:06 PM
drilled piers and load testing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:46 PM
belled piers huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:21 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:49 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多