几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 02:29 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 precomposite dead load deflection limits

precomposite dead load deflection limits
there are no hard and fast rules for the deflection of a composite steel beam under the weight of wet concrete (talking about unshored construction). just wondering what engineers have come across and apply in their designs.
do you limit the deflection at all, even if the beam is to be cambered? in other words, if you camber the beam for 80% of the dead load, do any problems develop if all of that camber (say 1-1/2" to 2" plus of deflection) all comes out when the wet concrete is placed. (we can tell the contractor to pour the slab to a set thickness, so having either ponding or a thin slab wouldn't be an issue for my question).
thanks,
one company i worked for had a policy of limiting camber to l/300 to make sure that the beam was not too bouncy. that was before the aisc vibration design guide came out, so maybe this rule-of-thumb can be exceeded if serviceability is explicitly checked.
another issue is that you may want to provide short slotted holes in deep beams to accomodate the rotation that occurs as the camber comes out under load.
i usually camber the beam to the dead load deflection. of course there are a lot of judgement calls to be made and many conditions where i dont camber a beam but for a typical floor filler beam i camber the beam to try to get it to be flat when construction is done and before it is loaded.
i typically camber out 3/4 of precomposite dl if this value is greater than 3/4". given the slight rotational stiffness of simple connections, i get a little concerned that if i camber for the full dl, my studs may start showing at midspan if the camber doesn't come out as i expect
i camber for dl deflection only. as jjeng said, one should use his judgment call based on full spectrum of project circumstance.
regards,
lutfi
are you using propped or un-propped permanent shuttering?
if propped, it may be easier to prop the beams also to eliminate deflection of the beams during your pour.
just a thought.
vb
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
partition live load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:35 AM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
deflection of beam supporting a concrete slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:57 PM
brick cladding deflection limits huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:48 PM
ad load factor in asd huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:22 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:25 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多