几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 05:42 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 reinforcing in-place structural steel

reinforcing in-place structural steel
i have a debate going on right now, and i am looking for help in clarification on the methods of analysis and implementation of reinforcing structural members.
first: when using a flat plate to reinforce a beam for deflection, the beam doesn't care whether it is a36 or gr. 50, as the increased ix and sx are acheived either way and deflection is aided by the reinforcing. but, if i am looking to reinforce for stress, and i have a gr 50 beam, wanting to use a a36 plate, shouldn't i increase the area of the plate by the ratio of fy50/fy36? the total area of the plate would effectively be capable of handling the same amount of force that a gr. 50 plate of smaller dimention could transmit. the weld can be designed based on shear flow between the two members as normal.
second: if i wanted to use an a36 channel, angle, or wt, what would be the proper way to run the analysis on the member. since two types of material are being used, it appears that the a36 would limit the design, as it is now the extreme fiber under stress. (assuming non-composite beam being reinforced)
any help would be appreciated. there's an article out there by john ruddy "reinforcing in-place structural elements" given in 1987 at the national engineering conference, but i can't seem to find a copy of this.
(warning, results of these answers will lead into reinforcing composite beams too,.... )
thanks
rob
check out our whitepaper library.
just received the paper by john ruddy from aisc, i'll post my findings, please provide me with your thoughts in the meantime.
if you mix yield strengths in your section you have two options: design the whole section as having the lower yield strength, or find the design strength taking into account the non-linearity after the weaker steel yields.
increasing the area of the plate would help with the capacity of the plate, but only because it increases both your section modulus and moment of inertia. i would not try any sort of scaling based on yield strength, but rather i would use one of the two approacheds mentioned above. you have to take into account that as soon as you hit 36 ksi, your plate extreme fiber yields and can not take any additional stress. this yielding will continue alomg the section depth as more load is added until you reach the junction of the two materials. you might then have a strain compatibility problem where one fiber is yielding and straining much more than the next fiber, depending on exactly what the stress state is.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
pe structural i or civil huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:54 AM
how to place minimum steel in a rectangular footing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:50 PM
how to handle see structural drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:48 PM
heat straightening of steel beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 04:00 PM
connection of structural steel with stainless steel huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:15 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:18 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多