几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 05:48 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 relative stiffness of steel frames and cmu shear walls

relative stiffness of steel frames and cmu shear walls
i've got a steel framed multi-story building. i'm using ordinary concentrically braced frames (or at least trying to). i've put frames everywhere i possibly can in the structure, but the foundation forces are still unacceptable. a face of the building is cmu, as are two stair towers and the elevator shaft. in addition to my ocbf's, i'd like to engage these cmu walls.
what would be the relative stiffness between the ocbf's and cmu shear walls? what procedure would be used to determine both? e of steel and e of cmu are quite different (roughly 29:1), and i don't think my ocbf's will take 29:1 times more load than the cmu shear walls.
well,
assuming you have rigid floor diaphragms, you should distribute the load based on the stiffness of the elements, such that they deflect the same amount. the stiffnesses depend on e as well as i.
to determine the relative stiffnesses, model the braced frame with an arbitrary load (say 10k) and model the shear wall with the same load. calculate the deflections, and the ratio of the deflections will give you the relative stiffnesses of the walls/frames.
if the center of mass and center of stiffness aren't the same, don't forget to take torsion into account.
it depends on the inertia also. you could put a unit load on the cmu stair and elevator shafts and get the deflection as compared to the deflection of the braced frames under a unit load at the same height, figure the stiffness=1/deflection. then compare the relative stiffness of the cmu versus the braced frames. the cmu will have shear and bending deflections and the braced frames have tension and compression contributions.
you have to get the inertia and modulus of elasticity of the cmu shafts and if you can input this into a computer model or figure the deflections by hand as compared to that of the braced frames.
distribution between the brace and cmu walls are based on the relative stiffnesses of the two systems per the two responses above.
if the cmu ends up veing very rigid compared to the ocbf, consider using a two stage static analysis and deliver all of the load into the cmu walls. i would still design the ocbf for the force distributed per relative stiffness.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
reinforcing on concrete blocks walls huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:42 PM
masonry bearing wall, supporting steel beam, joist, pos huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 12:25 PM
dual systems huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:52 PM
cmu isolation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:34 AM
2006 irc braced walls for townhouses huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:29 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:04 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多