几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 06:09 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 reshoring design fees

reshoring design fees
can anyone tell me what structural engineering design fees to expect for reshoring analysis calculations on a typical rc high-rise building? is the fee based on building square footage, no. of formwork drawings, or some other fee based criteria?
local practice here is that all engineering fees are based on the time taken for the work. it is normally based on hourly fees but sometimes a daily fee is used. personally i like a total job fee, but in any case it is based on a reasonable estimate of the hours involved.
hourly rates vary greatly depending on experience, they range from $cdn80 to $120 for the majority of the working engineers here. a higher rate can often result in less hours and a lower total cost. (more experienced engineers are faster.)
most engineers will attempt to balance the amount of analysis done with the value of the work being performed. if the engineering starts to get out of line with the value of the results they will makes some simplifying assumptions and expedite the work.
for new construction fees range from 5 to 15% of the value of the work.
for reconstruction this rule of thumb can go out the window since the amount of analysis is independent of the amount of work to be done. (an extensive and detailed analysis will cost more and may reduce the amount of remedial work necessary.)
rick kitson mba p.eng
construction project management
from conception to completion
are you preparing a proposal, or receiving them?
receiving them.
hmmm. do you often do this type of work - reshoring analysis/reshoring system design?
be careful. get someone experienced.
with the push towards economy on structures today, we have designed out the inherent redundancy in our structures. the construction phase is the most difficult and dangerous phase in the life of a structure. even if a structure is not visably damaged by local overloading during construction, damage may still occur. a proper well designed reshoring system is vital to ensure that the construction phase does not do damage to a building.
hopefully in the coming months, aci with publish a long awaited document on reshoring design and analysis that will help make the desicion easier as to when to involve a specialty reshoring contractor.
as far as fees, i don't really know. my time is rolled up into an estimate, though it comes to around $100 an hour, much less if you count time spent working while off the 40 hr a week clock.
daniel
the first place to look is your local engineering association. for new construction, there are usually established percentages of construction value assigned for different engineering jobs. the value of your work should be in relation to the inherent risk of the project. no one should take a job that carries a high percentage of risk for a low fee. what i am trying to say, is that checking a job like the one your describing should be allotted a sufficient amount of time to ensure that you are not rushing something throught just to make budget. this type of scenario could end up landing you in a pile of hot water, and ultimately, the cost of being involved in a lawsuit or complaint will greatly exceed the cost recieved for doing the work. the quoted fee for a particlar project should reflect this reality.
to elaborate on a point rdk made, one estimate i have seen published for fee increases in existing construction is 150% over new construction fees.
good luck
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
relevancy of code date-opinions sough huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:51 PM
reinforced concrete building design step-by-step huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:12 PM
in a design and built contract,i ha huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:16 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
calculations personal tool or public record huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:10 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:50 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多