几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:10 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 stirrup spacing check

stirrup spacing check
there are two code requirements that i look at when spacing my stirrups and these are:
s =< 48db, column width, (and one more that i can't remember!)
and
maximum spacing: s =< min(600mm, 0.7dv)
what is the difference between both of these checks and why was i told that the second check should not be performed when spacing stirrups in columns? the clause does not mention that the latter check is for beams only, which is why i was left confused when i was told to ignore it when designing stirrups in columns.
of course, upon asking the question to my supervisor, he responded "i don't have time to explain, just do it." heh.
clansman
find a job or post a job opening
i might as well ask in this thread: why are minimum requirements for horizontal rebar on walls higher than the minimum requirement for the vertical spacing of rebar on walls? just curious.
clansman
i think the one you forgot was 16d where d is the diameter of the vertical bars. i just looked for it in the code, but cannot find it either. i believe i recall from some long forgotten source that it has something to do with the buckling length of the vertical bars. if the column ties (not stirrups) are further apart than 16d, the main bars might buckle and fail to carry their expected load.
if you are talking about stirrups in a beam, they have to be spaced closer to avoid a shear failure resulting from a crack falling between the stirrups.
best regards,
ba
the specification of maximum spacing of stirrups of 48dt,16db and b or h whichever is smaller is only for column in aci code(318) and max. ermitted spacing of d/2 is for beams.the above specifications are apllicable to non-seismic resistant buildings.
the limit of d/2 is secified because length of shear crack is about 'd' in beams.
shear is not critical in columns beacuse shear strength of
i agree, except shear can control in a column on occasion, and then you actually need to design the ties as stirrups (and the spacing will be less than d/2).
horizontal reinforcement in a wall is heavier than vertical reinforcement, because a wall is much longer parallel to the horizontal bars. the bars are for crack control.
daveatkins
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
rebar spacing requirements for exterior exposure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 04:47 PM
correct column tie spacing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:04 PM
check of cantilever beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:26 PM
value of drawing check huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 01:48 PM
【转帖】value of drawing check yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 11:08 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:20 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多