几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:33 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 strengthening existing slab for punching shear

strengthening existing slab for punching shear
hi guys,
i have an existing slab that is changing from a carpark usage to retail. i have done a few numbers for punching shear with the the higher design loads and believe that the structure needs to be strengthened.
has anyone got some good reference material on how to strengthen the slab. i am thinking of either a bonded topping or shear collars. i have heard alot about both of these methods but have not been able to find any literature.
also, what are the steps i need to take in order to ensure a bonding topping will work for me in punching shear?
i am not surprised that the punching shear is insufficient as this is usually the critical factor in these slabs.
i suggest you look up seismic retrofit as the drift inthese tends to cause punching shear failure.
i'm confused. you're going from a carpark usage to a retail use and your slab loads are going up? where is the load coming from? are you picking up new lateral load and diaphragm?
ron:
seems counter intutive from everyday experience, but it is true.
parking garages are 40 psf live load per ibc table 1607.1, item 17. (i think it used to be 50 psf in previous editions).
retail stores are either 100 psf (first floor) or 75 psf (upper floors) live load per table 1607.1 item 38.

enlarge, or add brackets to, the column directly under the slab, if no existing capital is present. (sounds like the "shear collar" idea you mentioned.)
i have serious doubt on how effective the bonded topping would be. because no matter what you do (roughen the surface, add rebars, bonding agent..), a horiz. plane weak in shear has formed (theoretically possible, looking for trouble in reality, my personal opinion only).
there are several appoaches
1) drill and dowel reinforcement into the column and the slab and create a drop cap / capitol (not a drop panel, unless you plan on reducing moments in the slab and thus midspan deflections). think about a good concrete mix design that doesn't shrink excessively.
2) create a steel collar that is doweled into the column. grout the void created between the plate and the slab.
3) pour underslab beams (greater difficulty and greater calcs on strain compatibility and preload)
4) place steel beam between columns
note: my experience is that you may also have deflection issues with the new loading....may want to check it.
kslee1000 is right about the separation of the cover slab... you need to be looking at adding to the underside, so that any existing material presses down onto new.
collar or drop slab from below is the way to go. sorry but i don't know of any literature; i just design these as if the old and new portions are separate, and have always been very confident that they will combine strengths as i am adding below.
cheers,
ys
b.eng (carleton)
working in new zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...
we do a lot of shear collars, as we do a lot of renovation work.
the collars are designed to carry almost all the slab load because you won't really get any sharing unless the slab fails to some degree.
we typically use angles spanning between vertical stiffeners attached to a face plate and which has post-installed anchors to transfer shear to the column.
then we design the angle to transfer the shear in a uniform line load between stiffeners as a beam.
pretty straight forward, not sure i've ever seen any literature on it.
the
rc
all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
edmund burke

topping will work for punching shear but the horizontal crack may effect beam shear. roughen and add "moose milk" bonding liquid for topping addition.
one suggestion on construction support. since the deflection due to selfweight of the slab is already there, and would stay there, provide shoring only required to take out the construction live load imposed on the slab. that would minimize the stress changes in the interface between the old-new structures.
does your flexural reinforcement works for double the laoding.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
slab punshing shear and steel cap plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:27 PM
slab on grade problem huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:24 PM
shear in slab desig need to be considered or no huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 09:41 PM
increasing anchor embedment depth in an existing slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:25 PM
crack in old floor slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:20 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:35 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多