几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:54 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 structural abuse

structural abuse
just thought this was an interesting topic.
when have you seen the builder effectively violate the structural integrity of your design because of a clash with services e.t.c.
here is a good (meaning bad) example:
i saw something just like that once in, of all places, san francisco. a cross brace in a building was cut through (completely) to accommodate a pipe. built in the 1950's the building apparently stood fine through numerous seismic events until late 1990's when we discovered it.

just like it writes:
"never over estimate people inteligence - some people are stupid"
obviously the guy who cut it knew he was doing. the structure is still standing . that is crazy.
never, but never question engineer's judgement
over the years, we have encountered some pretty silly things:
cutting out of the webs of a bar joist to pass ductwork thru it.
cutting of a beam to run ductwork and then replacing the beam with jogging the beam around the ductwork in plan (one continuous beam... like a crankshaft in plan)
removal of bracing
thats just plain stupidity !
the guy who did that should be sacked immediately!
hey, some perfectly qualified engineer might have spent hours analyzing that beam and discerned that it could be cut like that without a loss of integrity.
jstephen-
that's a column (sic) not a beam
i doubt that very much !
anyone else have some good examples? some good ones regarding cantilevers are mentioned in the aisc site fixes lecture.
those are the kind of thing resident consultant engineers, or any one assigned to supervise the structures during construction or when any adjustment to buildings are done need to look at.
let us engineers open our eyes and see beyond beyond that!

practicing engineering is hard than studying it!!!
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
retraining as a structural engineer huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 06:45 PM
pe structural i or civil huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:54 AM
limits of practice for civil vs structural engineers huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:39 AM
how to handle see structural drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:48 PM
dimensions on structural drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:51 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:02 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多