几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:27 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 suspended roof floor slab cracked at supports

suspended roof floor slab cracked at supports
hi i would appreciate if someone could advice me on this problem. i have a situation where a driveway suspended slab at the roof level cracked at every supports (spaced up to 5m apart). the crack pattern seems continued and extending over the length of the beams underneath. is this type of crack associated due to thermal movement? or poor construction esp. reinf placing? i have noticed there is no expansion joints despite the slab spanning more then 45m.
check out our whitepaper library.
it is not possible to say whether the cracking which you describe is serious without knowing the details of construction. how thick is the slab? is it conventionally formed or cast on steel form deck? if deck, how deep? what are the beams made of and what size are they? are the cracks centred over the beams or at the edge of the beams?
do you have the structural drawings of the driveway? do you know what the design loading was? and do you know how the slab has actually been loaded?
with a bit more information, we may be able to give you a bit of advice, but in the end you should have a structural engineer in your area assess the structure.
thank you hokkie, please find some replies to your questions. the thickness of slab is ranging from 125mm to 150mm and it is designed as one way slab. it is formed in a conventionally method using formwork and props. all the beams are r.c and the primary beams size is 450mm x 750mm spanning max of 5m. all the cracks are at the centred over the beams.
in terms of loading, they have used 5kn/m2 (i.e. standard loading for vehicles) and have considered all the dead load. the total service design dead load is 8.5kn/m2. as such there seems satisfactory in term of loading calculation. well to answer your last question, i don't really have a complete report but it looks to me they have designed in very simplified method such as wl2/10 for bending moment and m.f for deflection checking, which is very conservative, i think.
any help? appreciate.
just some thoughts:
1) the 125 to 150 slab is a bit light for the 5000 spans. l/d is normally limited to about 28 for end spans and about 33 for internal spans.
2) the cracks definitely sound like flexural cracks rather than direction tension cracks. this could be due to either inadequate reinforcement quantity or improper placement of the reinforcement (too low).
3) 5kpa is more than adequate if just for automobile loading, but if there are any trucks or other heavy vehicles using the driveway, overload could be an issue.
4) is there any cracking on the slab soffits near midspan? if not, this probably indicates the top steel has yielded at the supports, but the bottom steel has not yielded.
5) if both top and bottom steel was designed for wl/10, and the live loads have not exceeded the 5 kpa design load, then the design is conservative and the cracks can be considered a serviceability issue rather than compromising the strength. as you said this was a roof driveway slab, you probably have a waterproofing issue.
i still recommend that you have a structural engineer assess the slab on site.
hi hokie thanks again,
you have cleared most of my doubts. actually i agreed with your advise as stated in item 2. it is a combination of poor workmanship esp. on the placement of top reinforcement and the design calculation with minimum thickness. bytheway do you have any idea on the pattern of crack that likely may form in a suspended slab if it is cast without any movement joints? your immediate reply and advises are very much appreciated.
when you talk about cracking in slabs caused by lack of movement joints, this type of cracking is due to direct tension rather than bending. direct tension forces are due to restraint. a concrete slab of indeterminate length will not crack as it shrinks if it is unrestrained. so the amount and pattern of cracking due to direct tension will depend on the restraint conditions and the amount of crack control reinforcement rather than just the length. many slabs are cast longer than your 45 metres without significant cracking.
sounds like you could have a durability issue here. deicing salts may have been used on the carpark and therefore they will have ingressed into the cracks.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
snow drift with parapet at high roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 12:01 AM
snow drift flat roof adjacent to gable huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:55 PM
perpendicular roof wind pressures huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 12:13 PM
low slope roof construction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:50 AM
flat roof repairs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:23 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:41 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多