几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:33 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 switch back stair analysisdesign

switch back stair analysis/design
dear all:
i am a structural engineer who has never done stair analysis/design ...for one of the projects i am currently working on the client wants us to design a "switchback" stair.the spans are such that deflections are becoming a big head ache esp when i apply the uniform live load on one flight of stairs only and nothing on the other flight or landing ...upon searching ibc etc i got the design loads to be the worst effect of a uniform load of 100 psf or a conc. load of 300 lbs; but these do not tell me if i can assume a percentage of this 100psf load to help with the deflections esp. when i apply the load only on one flight of stairs in the unbalanced load case....
please let me know if there is a reference/code out there that addresses this issue. any advice would greatly help me in designing this stair.
thanks.
matrixeric
check out our whitepaper library.
are you doing a stair where the intermediate landing is unsupported?
i have never designed stairs, but have checked several sets of calcs that have come in for jobs we are doing. i have never seen a stair stringer treated as a continuous span (as you are suggesting). maybe this is a function of the switchback stair (i have never heard of this). if, however, you are designing continuous spans i have to think you must consider skip loading to provide the most critical conditions similar to any continuous beam.
what
i will try to answer all of your questions at the same time:
jike: i have one column in the centre of the intermediate landing which is my only support in addition to the ends of the stringers at the foundations and deck connection.
structuraleit: you are correct. the geometry with which i am dealing with meant that i need to have the stringers analyzed as continuous to make it work.
ucfse: it is the stringer that has deflection problems. this being a aess stair we are trying to limit the deflections to a 0.5"(live load deflection) at this point of time. do not know if the constraints given to us will allow that.i am assuming stringers to be assumed fixed at the bottom(fdn.) and pinned at the level where it is connected to the deck.
just so that it is easy to visualize, can some one let me know a way to post an image/pdf out here.
if you have a centered column at the intermediate landing, you should be able to reasonably control deflections. this column should be a t support with a fixed base.
it is advisable to have the full ll on one side to obtain the worst possible situation. it is not a common situation, but i can envision the possibility of a group of people getting on the stairs to take a group photo.
click on "process tgml" right above the "submit post" button. scroll down to the image instructions.
and...you'll have to upload that pic to an image hosting site (like
alright, the stair i am envisioning has an intermediate landing and a landing at the actual floor level. the stringer is running up to the intermediate landing then reverses directions to run up to the actual floor level such that the intermediate landings are over top of each other and the actual floor landings are over top of each other (but the intermediate landings are not over top of the actual floor landings).
------- actual floor
-
-
-
-
------ intermediate (pin support)
-
-
-
-
------- actual floor (fixed support)
with this being the case, and you designing for fixed at base (foundation connection) and pinned at the landing i am failing to see how this would be considered a continuous beam.
the stair would have a pinned base (not fixed) and each stringer would be designed as a simple beam spanning from the floor to the end of the landing (cantilevering past the t shaped column support depending its exact location).
jike-
i agree, but it sounds from the op that these stringers are being designed as continuous for more than just the intermediate support. continuous over the intermediate support still means it is supporting only one flight of stairs, but the op says that one flight of stairs (as the unbalanced case) is the worst.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
radius stair stringer huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 04:09 PM
how to account for curve in radial steel stair design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:35 PM
circular stair - flat bar stringer huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:47 PM
beam made of back-to-back channels huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:57 PM
back to back channels huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:08 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:44 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多