几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 02:49 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 imber roof spread

timber roof spread
hi all.
i'm designing a timber cut roof with a lack of triangulation. it typically consists of 2 rafters supported at the feet on block walls. there is a raised collar tie about 1/3 depth from the ridge. there is no ring beam at eaves.
has anybody any experience in what to check for this case?
i run this situation on the computer (i use risa 3d). in my experience, the connection between the collar and the rafter is most critical, followed by the bending-axial interaction in the rafter.
daveatkins
right dave.
and you'd better consider the deflection of the rafters the collar tie is pulling on. might have to make the rafters larger, maybe double them up with a single
thanks guys.
i'm actually more concerned about possible supporting wall spread. what lateral deflection limits do you use for the wall? in the past i've used h/300 as my limit.
another option i've checked before is to use a pinned support at each of the feet of the rafters and applied the lateral load from the rafters to the wall. this will induce an overturning moment about the bottom of the wall. the resisting moment of the wall is the (weight of the wall + dead load) x lever arm. i've never been able to prove this however.
any suggested checks on the supporting walls?
sounds like you need a structural ridge to prevent your rafters from deflecting, thus preventing the spread.
allowable deflection at the top of the wall depends on wall finishes. h/300 would be fine for masonry--i think you could allow h/180 for less brittle finishes. re
thanks guys.
i've actually used daveatkins' solution in the past-i was just looking for some comfort in my logic i suppose!
also daveatkins 2nd point i would agree with, as my wall overturning calculations would suggest.
in some places they call this an a-frame truss due to the shape.
rafters cantilever out from the collar ties.
lateral loads taken by sheathing.
it can all be done pretty easy by hand treating the rafters as a cantilevered continuous beam.
csd
really, there are three ways to control any lateral wall movement here short of adding a ridge beam:
1. increase the rafter size; or
2. increase the e of the rafters; or
3. lower the collar tie.
just pin one end of the collar tie, put the other on rollers, and play with the results. the less bending in the rafters, the less lateral movement.
mike mccann
mccann engineering
or
4. put a load bearing ridge beam in.
as i said csd, short of adding a ridge beam.
mike mccann
mccann engineering
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
snow drift with parapet at high roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 12:01 AM
snow drift flat roof adjacent to gable huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:55 PM
perpendicular roof wind pressures huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 12:13 PM
low slope roof construction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:50 AM
flat roof repairs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:23 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:02 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多