几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 04:56 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 unbalanced snow load ibc 2000

unbalanced snow load ibc 2000
i am designing roof rafters for a single family residence. if i apply an unbalanced snow load, the rafters in the ibc residential code tables do not work. (my model includes a ceiling joist). i can only get the rafters in the table to work with balanced snow loads.
does anybody know of a stipulation in the code where you do not have to apply unbalanced snow loads to residential buildings?
thanks!
check out our whitepaper library.
so why dont you design with an unbalanced snow load.
i don't want to design the roof for unbalanced snow load if i don't have to. i was already accused by another engineer of being overconservative with the roof design on a previous residential design project. i would like to know definatively either way.
the leeward drifts from the asce 7 hammer a rafter design with 150% pf. as i understand it, this is what the ibc says to do irrespective of occupany (i=1.0).
you are governed by the irc. the ibc is a code book whereas i view the irc as more of a recipe book. i am doing good to stay up with the ibc changes every three years and thus do not profess to know that much about the irc. look in the irc and i expect it says the span tables are ok w/o drifting. irc r301.2.3.
for what it's worth, i design any rafter and its connections for the drifted snow condition.
check whether ibc and asce 7 even govern this design. usually, the irc controls residential design and you may not have to even refer to the other two.
if it is single family with 3 stories or less, then irc is your code. if your ground snow load is 70 psf or less, you use the tables in irc (chap 5,6 and 8). i don't have the commentary handy, but i think your issue is taken into account in the table values.
zcp
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
unbalanced snow asce 7-98 vs asce 7-02 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 04:55 PM
snow load on pergola huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 12:04 AM
question on wind load provisions of ibc 2000 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 03:57 PM
partition live load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:35 AM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:22 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多