几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 07:07 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 water and sand at bottom of under ream piles

water and sand at bottom of under ream piles
what are the remedies when one get water and sand layer at the bottom of bored under reamed piles ? piles can not go further below because of sandy soil.

enlarging the bottom end of a pile can find some difficulties like this. it is for this that constant section piles are everyday more recommendable.
i first would analyze the safey loss if any of relevance.
to this purpose i would try different evaluations of the capacity, pile strength evaluation varies wildly following different authors. if with the help of one competent geotech consulting, also in settlement (that i would try myself if relevant, in any case).
for most cases water flow should not be as big as to prevent to form at least a bulb end, what would require some injection pressure, and likely the pile be sheathed.
and you can add more piles if proven the solution.
thanks ishvaag
increasing the diameter of the piles can be the remedy or not ?
it should since both friction/adhesion surface and more importantly tip bearing resistance both increase, and these are the 2 items contributing to strength by most evaluations.
agree with ishvaaag - i had a library project some time ago that required drilled piers with belled ends. the soil report had recommended these and the design required some pretty big belled diameters (12 foot as a max.)
when the contractor started drilling, the soil was much sandier than anticipated and the bells caved in. the geotech and i came up with a straight shaft option and abandoned the belled piers. the straight shafts were much larger than the shaft diameters of the belled piers but that was really the only other option. you cannot open-bell a pier in soil that will not hold its shape. and i'm not aware of any safe way to shore up the bells - i wouldn't go down there with unstable soils.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:30 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多