几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:13 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 wind loads on fence

wind loads on fence
any suggestions for designing wind load forces on a 6' aluminum fence (2x2 posts with (15) 5/8" square pickets)? i have a client that wants this fence engineered for 110 mph wind load according to the new florida building code. using asce 7-98, i ran numbers using the trussed tower coefficient but cf comes out to 3.02 which gives me a pressure of 30psf on the solid area. this seems excessive, but what other coefficient should i use?
does your client also want you to check it out for a falling palm tree, or a projectile at 110 mph too? or maybe a runaway motor vehicle! imo, seems a bit ridiculous or a least impractical for such a condition see if the he/she is reallllly willing to pay for the "engineered fence" construction first before you get too bogged down into design and details.
ingenuity,
i share your sentiments. they (the building departments)have gone crazy with our new building code (and it's only been in effect since march 1). as far as i'm concerned it is ridiculous, but the manufacturer has asked me to check so it can get permitted in that city.
wbruseski,
for a fence i would use the coefficient for open signs (table 6-12)that varies from 1.6 to 2.0 for flat sided
wbruseski...i would use the sign coefficients as well. since you are checking for 110 mph, that would imply you are not in a wind-borne debris area of florida (those start at 120mph), so you should not be subject to those provisions of the code.
unfortunately you are at the mercy of the local building official. the new code is no different than the old in that respect!
a 2x2 post on a 6-foot fence might give you a problem with passing, unless it is thicker than the usual posts. even a 48-inch high handrail gets marginal for some of the coastal loadings. surprising how much sail area you can get from a slatted fence or handrail!
i was tasked with designing a rolling fence gate (8-feet high) for "a major central florida tourist attraction" a few years back. the resulting loads were a bit shocking.
thanks to all for your input. the open sign coefficient helps a lot but i did need to increase the thickness from 0.062 to min 0.120 inch thickness for the 2x2 post.
in regards to the concern about the projectile (dlew), i'm checking for allowable bending and shear stresses (with considerable factors of safety according to the code). these fences have posts with 2 feet of embedment surrounded by 6" dia. x 24" deep concrete. as far as i'm concerned these fence panels would never become "projectiles", they may just bend over a little.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
what wind loads on building canopy huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 08:36 PM
ransient loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 03:35 PM
emporary wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 01:09 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:34 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多