几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:33 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 wire rope

wire rope
does anyone have any suggestions as to reference material (references, tests, studies, etc) concerning embedment criteria for wire rope. i have been asked to design some precast lifting details using 6x19 class wire rope purple grade. found plenty of information concerning the wire rope but none on embedment criteria. am not quite sure how to figure the amount of embedment required to develope it. the two lifts are estimated at 59,000# and 99,000#. any suggestions are welcome. thanks in advance.
i am no precast expert, but my opinion is that you should not embed the wire rope into the precast, but instead cast a female anchor of some sort into the precast, and thread an eyebolt into this anchor. the wire rope would then be looped through the eyebolt.
daveatkins
agree with daveatkins about not embedding wire rope in concrete. for the loads that you describe, suggest using wire rope sockets for attachment, rather than loops. see info beginning on page 70 of "uss wire rope engineering handbook" - it can be downloaded from my website homepage (link below).
most state dot’s have standard lifting device designs for precast box beams and girders. for precast bridge construction i am use to seeing a par of lifting devices consisting of two or three bundled prestressing strands embedded in the concrete. here are a couple of examples.
jd2, i've got some practical, unpublished information regarding using remnants of prestressing strand in precast panels for lifting. the table was developed in 1972 by the chief engineer of formigli corporation, a well known precast manufacturer by whom i was employed at the time. the load values are based upon testing, tempered by structural analyses.
if you use rope you might exceed the preferred bending radius which i think is about 16:1. as you bend tighter than this you start to effect the capacity of the wire. at 10:1 the wire will start to distort and around 5:1 the wire will use strength.
could i suggest using something like:
thanks to all for your responses/advice/information. personally, i try to utilize engineered connectors (as per ussuri) whenever possible whether it be for wood, concrete, metal stud, etc. in this case, i was specifically requested by the gc to look at wire rope. i used to work for a precast/prestressed manufacturer and, as mentioned by epr, we used pieces of pre-stressed strand as lifting inserts. this was always done as a "we've done it this way for years and have never had any problems with it" and it was in the company engineering manual as a "do it this way" method with no calculations as backup (but many years of "testing"). without any experience with wire rope, i was not sure if the embedment/development requirements would be exactly the same as pre-stressing strand. regardless, after posting the initial request in this thread and doing some research (thank you michst), i notified the gc that i did not have the ability to properly analyze the situation as he requested it and that he would need to modify his request to include other inserts, methods of picking, etc. or he would need to find another engineer with wire rope experience. have not heard back from him in several days so i guess the issue is dead (at least for me). again, i thank everyone for their input.
it's not uncommon in these environs to use 'waste' strand for lifting loops with some precast elements.
epr: is it possible for you to upload your info to sre's website?
sre: ok?
dik
dik,
i'll send it to sre, and he can determine whether he wants to post it on his site.
thanks, epr, it's on my site now (top of the home page)
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
wire rope as tension member in a truss huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 10:31 PM
wire rope and zinc-poured sockets huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 10:31 PM
wire mesh size huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 10:31 PM
elongation of wire rope huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 10:07 PM
cable or wire rope, minimum tensile strength huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 06:02 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:00 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多