几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 10:43 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 aisc slenderness check vs aisc combined axial and bending ch

aisc slenderness check vs aisc combined axial and bending ch
can anyone tell me why the aisc code has both the slenderness check and the check for the loading case of combined bending and axial? dosen't satisfying the equations h1-1, h1-2 & h1-3 act as a check on buckling. if so then why does the slenderness check need to be done?
the slenderness check in section b-7 that slenderness ratios should be less than 200, but if it is larger, the allowable stress shall not exceed equation e2-2. can someone please explain this requirement?
does anyone know where i can see the derivation of equation h1-1.
thanks in advance for any help with these questions.
tony billeaud
mechanical engineer
i am no expert on either the asd or lrfd versions, but i think i know what you are getting at:
i believe that the slenderness limits come from the asd codes, which do not fully allow for secondary effects and therefore may become un conservative at higher slenderness.
the lrfd code specifies second order analysis provisions and therefore it probably isnt applicable, but it has stayed in and therefore should be adhered to. by reference, the australian codes have dropped these slenderness limits about a decade ago.
it is also these second order effects that are the reson why you check this buckling twice as an out of straightness will have moments imposed by both bending stress and axial stress superimposed. this effects can be greater than the sum due to second order.
the formula h1-1 is similar to that for most steel codes throughout the world.
the slenderness check in b7 (kl/r should be less than 200) is a guideline. like you note, if it exceeds 200, you must use equation e2-2, which is the euler buckling equation. you want to avoid going higher than 200, but you're not required to.
the commentary to the specification (located after the spec chapters and appendices) has good information pertaining to this and your question about the interaction equations in chapter h.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:31 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多