几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 03:27 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 bending moment induced by shims

bending moment induced by shims
this is a rather embarrassing riddle for me since i've been in the aerospace industry for 20 yrs now:
we have a skin 0.130 thick that has a dent at the edge. the dent is 0.040 out of plane over about 5.0 inches wide.
residual stresses are about 15 ksi. we are not going to reverse bend it (not allowed of course). we will be able to lay it up and shim out the gaps. even with the residual stress i can show it good statically and for crack growth.
problem: i made the mistake of reviewing the mc/i bending stress induced by the 0.040 thick shim. when you add this bending stress to the residual stress i can not show this part good.
example: take a strip model 1.0 wide x 0.130 thick with 10 ksi axial tension stress. make it eccentric by 0.040 inch. this creates a bending moment of 18.5 ksi which is significant.
i know intuitively that it is overly conservative to add the entire bending moment induced by an 0.040 shim due to the fixity of the adjacent structure. i know that the load will really want to go straight and the load will redistribute around this hump. heck, we shim stuff in this range all the time.
question: how do i prove that this 18.5 ksi is not real and/or not a concern? (without a horrendous spring model or fem project)?
easyaim,
it could be that you are using the wrong theory to analyize your situation.
according to seely & smith (advanced mechanics of materials, 2nd ed.), plates may be divided into three groups. "thick plates", in which shearing stresses are important, "medium-thick" plates in which bending is the main means of resistance, and "thin plates" who useful resistance depends in part on direct tension.
i suggest you do some research into thin plate theory and see if your situation improves.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
beams shear splices vs. moment splices huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:13 PM
beam design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:52 PM
analysis theory for retaining wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:41 AM
allowable bending stress in plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:52 AM
aisc 13th ed. and cjp dw moment connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:27 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:26 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多