几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 09:21 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 class 2 formwork finish

class 2 formwork finish
had a job here that the architect specified class 2 formwork finish. the builder is now saying the plastic reinforcement chairs are showing up through the concrete finish. any ideas on how to fix this?
find a job or post a job opening
reinforcement must be supported with something and plastic tipped chairs would be what i would be using. if they show up it would have negligable effect, nothing can really be done to fix this.

plastic chairs generally have a bigger 'footprint' than plastic tipped steel chairs (which are less durable). i've found fibre cement chairs to be a better option for high quality architectural finishes and in aggressive environments than either.
at this point, there is no good fix; bagging probably will show up even more.
thanks, if the chairs are still visible would you still consider it a class 2 finish?

where does find the definition of "class 2" finish? it does not sound like an aci term.

ralph
structures consulting
northeast usa
it is an australian term.
it is also a canadian term.
class 2 finish should be defined in the code or standard of the place nicam is from. in b.c., canada, it even defines the number and maximum size of bugholes.i would be very surprised if it is not so in his area
there is nothing in the as3600 formwork finishes that refers to the visibility or otherwise of bar chairs. you may be able to incorporate that aspect into another section of the table but that interpretation would probably be subject to negotiation, more difficult after the fact.
a proper class 2 finish is quite challenging for a lot of contractors more used to producing class 3 or worse. what are the test panels like? establishing and maintaining a standard for a high class finish is difficult without prior test panels (you did it good enough last time, why not this time). is a class 2 finish necessary and appropriate, per the architect's intent?
photos make it a lot easier to judge whether your situation is acceptable or not, of course.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】why Is There So Many Link Errors yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-07 07:10 PM
【转帖】unresolved Externals Linking To Dwgdirect V1.14.02 yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-07 05:49 PM
【转帖】2005 link error yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-04 02:57 PM
C++风格与技巧(转) huangyhg vc编程 0 2008-10-27 11:03 AM
C++风格与技巧 Faq huangyhg vc编程 0 2007-10-29 02:24 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:39 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多