几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 11:30 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 log structures lateral design

log structures lateral design
does anyone know if log walls have been addressed in ibc in reguards to lateral design (seismic and wind). i don't see anything in table 12.14-1 in the seismic section for logs? am i missing it?
check out our whitepaper library.
i assume you mean the table in asce 7-05. this deals with the simplified procedure. does your building qualify for this table?
i have done these structures for years and would conservatively use resisting system a14, "light framed walls with shear panels of other materials", giving an r of 2, which i believe to be way too low, but than is what is available.
mike mccann
mccann engineering
check out this other thread and the articles from structures magazine. it was interesting to me that the most argued about and unresolved item from the new draft icc spec on log homes was the seismic design value r. one of the articles in structures magazine recommends a r=4.0 to 5.0. i ususally use 4.0. i tried using 2.0 like mike stated and here in the pacific northwest it produced accelleration loads over 0.5 which is unreasonable. using r=4.0 usually gives accelleration values between 0.24 and 0.35 which is which is workable.
good luck.
this article should get you in the right direction.
thanks everyone!!
i agree fully with rock engineer and have found the same to be true as i am in the psacific northwest too, at least i hope to be after the river crests (just kidding). i have never used the vlalue of 2.0, but in the 4 to 5 range too. seems much more logical seismically considering the behaviour of the structure when you really think about it. i have never had a question from any local or out of state jurisdiction on my method of analysis for these structures, and i am licensed in 4 western states.
i analyze these structures as shear resisting structures, relying on the pins and rods to resist the shear in lateral bearing on the logs. works for me.
mike mccann
mccann engineering
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
in a design and built contract,i ha huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:16 PM
dots requiring pe stamps on shop drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:18 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
contract issues - structural steel connection design in the huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:40 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:08 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多