几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 04:40 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 nonshrink grout vs type i grou

nonshrink grout vs type i grout
my contractor has decided to use type i cement grout underneath the baseplates of our 5 story building rather than use non-shrink grout spec'd in our drawings conforming to astm c1107.
we are at a point where we need to find some evidence that his grout is unacceptable. what makes it more complicated is that we are on the same team. so, does anyone know of a reference that shows that non-shrink grout is the only acceptable type or that masonry grout is not acceptable?
again, i am not looking for anything but references. i fully understand what non-shrink grout is intended for and how it acts, but i'm not finding many references in the literature.
check out our whitepaper library.
if his grout shrinks, which all portland cement based grouts do, than it is unacceptable. this should be a no brainer, no shrink is always required.
why is the contractor deciding what to use?
does your project have any specifications? you will be hard pressed to find a "type i grout" that meets any specifications for grouting under bearing plates unless it is a casual use. to be a nit-picker, the only question should be whether the grout be metallic or non-metallic.
masonry grout using type i cement is a totally different material that could not be used in this application.
dick
being on the same team with a contractor who wants to cut corners is a bear. here is where your mettle is tested. talk louder and louder until he listens.
alright, looks like everyone missed my point. the contractor is not fighting me on this. i just need references if they exist.
if there is no conflict then surely a lack of evidence that type i is acceptable would be enough.
i don't think that shrinkage is the issue here. after all, if the grout shrinks 2-3%, that's peanuts compared to normal footing settlement. compressive strength is the issue. grout under bearing plates should reach 5000 psi (or your footing strength) in 7 days (your spec should state that). masonry grout is often only required to reach 2000 psi at 28 days. so, if the grout mix doesn't meet your specified strength, it is unacceptable.
i think shrinkage is an issue.
if the steel fabricator uses leveling nuts and the grout shrinks the anchor bolts will transferring the axial load instead of bearing through the grout. if the fabricator uses leveling plates and the grout shrinks the anchor bolts will probably not be properly tightened anymore. the latter case would depend how soon the columns are erected after the grout/leveling plates are set.
eit-
you're right.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
mortar and grou huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 03:14 PM
masonry course grout max size agg huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 12:32 PM
grout vs mortar in reinforced masonry huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:20 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:16 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多