几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 04:33 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 rc vs. steel

rc vs. steel
i am conducting a study about structural framing materials and i am focus on reinforced concrete (rc) and structural steel (wide flange section). my idea is to consider a frame model and design it as reinforced concrete and steel then compare the results.
i have a problem in generating my model, since in reinforced concrete, the ground floor columns are fixed to the pedestal going to the footing; but in steel framing system, the ground columns are connected by base plate to the pedestal and usually hinged. it seems that i dont have a common structure since for rc the ground columns are fixed and hinged for steel.
am i correct in my assumptions? is there something that i forgot to consider? i am only comparing the superstructure of the building.
i need to hear your smart opinion guys. thanks..
rlc
it depends of your intent. however the issue you are undertaking should be to most practical effects irrelevant. you can, if so wanted, get the steel baseplate connection enabled for moment, or simply, neglect the difference on the basis that you in doing so are just following standard practices. sometimes the most practical way of not seeing a problem is ignoring it; imagine the suffering of some aesthetically inclined man or woman seeing the imperfections at the huge amounts of detailing our human contraptions have; i can bet you understand we all have learnt to ignore them to some extent. i, for once, never should have delivered any works to use, for all them had standing imperfections at the ends of the works. and even for those that say theirs had none, i can assure you, if i was inspecting, i would find more than (it is clear) they are wanting to assume.
if you place nominal size starter bars(without any actual design for moment) then you may assume a pinned connection in reinforced concrete design, just as it is assumed for steel design, i.e. still use substantial hd bolts (and 4 of) but not designed for any moment in steel structures.
i have seen several similar comparisons made by industry bodies promoting either steel or concrete. i would look at these before reinventing the wheel. try searching for these comparative studies. in the end there will have to be some differences as the materials work differently.
ishvaaag,
my intention is to compare steel and rc as structural material for framing system considering cost, construction time frame and story drift. in doing so, i would like to meet standards in structural design and standard construction practice.
civeng80,
the common assumption in steel design is that the column is pinned connected to the base plate, but in reinforced concrete it is poured monolithically and usually assumed as fixed. please ilaborate your idea.
i was at a seminar a few years ago put on by the aisc. they made an argument for using springs at the bottom of pinned steel columns because they are not truly pinned. the equation they used was:
partial fixity = 0.4ei/l
this was based off the old k values used for column design. i don't know how applicable the equation is today. you would have to make that determination.
also, the pci design handbook has an equation for developing the spring resistance of a base plate based off the column size, base plate geometry/thickness, anchor bolt length/position/thickness, and footing size/soil sub grade modulus. i'm not sure if you can use a version of this equation in you analysis.

what brings to mind the meaning of standard. one can think as standard from some code, as practiced for most or as allowed by the technology itself. each is a kind of standard and you can place your comparison in any of the meanings.
i love ishvaaag's replies! like poetry
for the concrete building, it would depend on the foundation type.
if spread footings, i would never consider it to be fixed. depending on the ground conditions it may be possible to generate some fixity with footings into solid rock. otherwise, pinned.
if piles, it would depend on the filing arrangement whether or not fixity can be generated.
if it is a raft slab, you do not get full fixity. this should come out in the 3d analysis..
it is entirely up to the designer whether a pin or fixed connection is assumed in structural design and analysis and it is irrelavent whether material is steel or concrete.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
question regarding floor support beam installation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 03:58 PM
how to place minimum steel in a rectangular footing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:50 PM
heat straightening of steel beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 04:00 PM
cross bracing within steel stud wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 03:57 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:12 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多