几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 09:02 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 seismic percentage

seismic percentage
i have been doing some wind/seismic calculations for relatively light structures. the wind forces are much higher than the seismic forces in this case due to site locations.
when using the equivalent lateral force procedure i come up with basically a percentage of the weight to use as my base shear. in the high-seismic areas, how high can this percentage get? just wondering what would be the all-out worst case? 50%? i deal with seismic on such an infrequent basis that i don't have a good feel for the numbers.
it really varies depending on your seismic response factor r which is determined by your material and type of construction. from asce 7-05 table 12-14.1 you can have r values ranging from 1.5 for plain concrete to 8 for buckling restrained braced frames. normal light framed wood construction is 6.5.
in washington state which is moderately high seismic the percentage of horizontal load to weight for a wood framed structure usually runs below 16%. my understanding is when you get into the range of horizontal acceleration greater than about 25% the equations aren't realistic.
referring to asce 7-05-
pg. 220 shows areas with ss=300% = 3.0
then fa=1.0 maximum, sms=3.0, sds=2.0
in table 12.2-1, r can be as low as 1.0.
i, importance factor, can be 1.5.
then cs = sds/(r/i)= 3
and v = cs * w = 300% of w in 12.8.
that's not to say you'd actually see this- you'd try to use a structure type with higher r, for example. and the jobs i've seen where seismic loading was really high also had site-specific response spectra, so you weren't working off of standard code provisions.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
seismic load on basement wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 08:55 PM
seismic design of retaining walls huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 08:45 PM
really basic, kinda stupid seismic question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 04:39 PM
ibc vs. aisc seismic - revisited huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:57 PM
ibc 2000 - seismic-force-resisting system huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:41 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多