几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 10:40 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 signing new copies of old drawing sets

signing new copies of old drawing sets
occasionally i need to print out new sets of plans that have been previously issued and sign/seal them (contractor lost originals or other reasons). as the original sets may have been signed months ago, it seems like something is missing if i just sign with today's date. should i add a line under the signature saying when the original seal was or something else to that effect? i certainly don't want to give the impression that i have updated the plans (especially if there has been a code change in the interim). what do other folks do in similar cases?

you should be printing those from the original signed mylars or from scans of the signed mylars and no re-signature should be required. hopefully the mylars were not lost also
we scan in a copy of our stamps and signiture for each project, and attach the .jpg file to the autocadd file of the drawing.
if we need to reprint sheets, we print the autocadd file. if someone else needs to print the file, we make a pdf or dwf file of each drawing and send them the pdf/dwf's to print.
we back date our plans in situations like this. i'm sure someone will have an "ethical objection" to this practice, so fire away.
it's not the printing that is the problem, it's how you sign that is the question. i have been avoiding the backdating because it seems strange to sign something and put an old date on it.
i sign using the current date but mark it as a duplicate.
if the drawing is unchanged and i sealed it in the first place, i just sign it and use the current date on it.
the local jurisdiction should have kept an approved and stampled construction planset for its records. have him get a copy of that from them.
mike mccann
mccann engineering
i would caution against simply having your cadd guy replot the drawing from autocad and re-signing it. if any other engineers are like me, several things can happen to mess this up (all falling into the category of murphy's law):
a) you revised one of the sheets by hand and didn't tell the drafter to add the change to the cadd file
b) when your drafter plots the second time, someone has inadvertantly frozen a (critical) layer
c) when you plot the second time, someone has moved or renamed the xref files and they do not plot at all
d) or the worst of all, your drafter plots the wrong file. he probably grabs the pre-final submittal instead of the approved final one...
best way is to scan your signed plans and replot from pdf.
why just not scan the original set of drawings after they have all been signed off. if client or whoever asks for the drawings again (lost, etc. as you indicated), you just print off the scanned copy and stamp the drawing as "duplicate issue" and then sign off that the scanned copy is "as per original issue." you can date your note - but you will not be changing anything regarding the original drawing issue.
we keep copies of the sealed drawings and just run copies of those. if you don't have a sealed copy i would sign it and seal it with the orginal date. if party a is looking at party b's print they are going to spend an hpour trying to figure out if the drawing was revised. i would simply note on the transmittal that you have signed and sealed the drawings with the orginal issue date. then keep a copy of both.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
of shop drawing copies huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 04:56 PM
drawing number system - do you still indicate dwg sie in the huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 10:30 AM
datum reference style old new on y14.5m standard drawing huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:44 PM
【转帖】drawing number system - do you still indicate dwg sie in the yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:45 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:32 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多