几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:19 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 sog shear reinforcing under wall

sog shear reinforcing under wall
i am hoping someone can point me in the right direcion. i am looking for recommended shear reinforcing details for a slab-on-grade with a heavily loaded wall. going thicker with the slab is not a practical option at this point and was wondering if there are any references out there that specifically address this situation. i can find lot with suspended slabs but nothing that seems specific to a slab on grade. is this not a recommended practice? particularly if the slab needs to remain water tight? i am currntly entertaining the idea of a "u" or "z" sirrup but the spacing is going to need to be pretty tight.
i appreciate any thoughts you may have.
thanks,
waytsh
put in a thickened footing or separate footing under the wall.
refer to "designing floor slabs on grade" by ringo and anderson.
consider strips of shear studs like those used on elevated slabs supported at columns. if you turn your problem upside down, the loading is very similar: a distributed load on the slab (soil reaction) and a point support (wall load).
a more desirable solution would be to install a thicker footing designed for the wall, but it sounds like the slab base, reinforcing, and wall forms are already in place (?).
don't forget that aci 318, section 15.7 states that the minimum footing thickness is based on a minimum depth to rebar, d = 6".
so with 3" cover you have about a 10" slab minimum.
my slab is currently a uniform 15" thick. it does not make sense to me but the owner and contractor insist that it is going to be much cheaper for them to install the shear stirrups instead of just thickening the slab. i have considered the shear studs and may go with them if there is not a good reason for avoiding shear reinforcing. maybe the owner and contractor will then realize just how expensive this shear reinforcing is going to be.
the wall is bearing on the slab on grade and is supported by granular fill? can you place a concrete pour under the sog in the vicinity of the wall? should be inexpensive just a matter of excavating, compacting and placing concrete... what is the consequence of the slab cracking? is it worth the risk? even with large amounts of steel, the slab can still crack.
can the wall width be increased? a small pedestal? is the problem beam shear? or punching shear? can you use shear friction? with large bars? a recent project has 35m@6"
a 15" thick slab ought to be able to support alot of load. how much load are we talking about? joint locations?
i assume it already has top and bottom reinforcing. how much reinforcing? are you sure you need shear reinforcing?
what is the soil modulus?
dik, thanks for the suggestions. the wall is precast so unfortunately i can not go any thicker than what it already is. the problem is punching shear. i had thought about shear friction since i will have a substantial amount of flexural reinforcing under the wall. i didn鈥檛 think i could 鈥渄ouble dip鈥?on the reinforcing if it is already being used to resist flexure鈥r are you suggesting additional reinforcing specific to that purpose?
maybe i better mention my analysis approach as well in case that is flawed. i have analyzed the slab on staadpro because of the complexity of the loading and the wall system. for my worst case load combination i am getting a shear stress under my wall of 108.2 psi. which translates to about 19.5 k/ft. which i am then checking against aci 318 eq. 11-3 or 11-5. for my model i used a uniform thickness of 15鈥?but in reality the slab is only 12鈥?thick under the wall because of the keyway. so my d is approximately 8.5. my concrete is 4,000 psi so i am getting an allowable shear strength of 9.68 k/ft for a one foot wide section.
is this a rational approach or am i oversimplifying?
thanks,
waytsh
sorry jike, you posted as i was writing and i didn't notice before submitting. the unfactored load from that particular wall is dl = 10.5 k/ft and ll = 13.9 k/ft. the wall is 14" thick. i will have top and bottom mats in the slab under the wall. it is going to be #5 bar @ 8" o.c. but i may need to change the bottom mat to something like #9 bar @ 4" o.c. to meet the flexural requirements. i haven't determined what i am going to do there yet.
soil modulus = 90 pci
sounds like you did a beam on elastic foundation analysis.
is there any way to increase the concrete strength?
or
is there any way to eliminate the keyway?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
reinforcing on concrete blocks walls huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:42 PM
in-plane tilt wall shear reinforcing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:20 PM
in enercalc masonry wall design, what is parapet heigh huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:17 PM
foundation wall 40 feet below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:38 PM
block shear vs. shear rupture at connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:57 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:32 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多