几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:44 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 stresses in a bent bar

stresses in a bent bar
a quick design question....
assume a steel bar is bent into a u-shape, and the two legs of the bar are embedded into concrete such that the yield strength of the bar can be developed (by means of cross bars welded to the legs of the bent bars).
now if i pick up the concrete section with these u-bars, and if each u-bar has a certain load "x" - say 2000 lbs total load per location, then what is the maximum stress in the bar?
i have always assumed that the maximum stress occurs in the bend of the bar and is about 2x the total stess in each straight leg of the bar assembly. (if the lifted weight is 2000 lbs per anchor, then the load in each leg of the bar is 1000 lbs and the load at the bend is equal to 2000 lbs, due to the geometry.)
does anyone have any ways of checking the maximum stress in the bar?
these contraptions except failing through slippage i read in fritz leonhardt's fail where the curve joins the straight part. hence axial stress plus bendiing locked effects plus friction must be causing the relevant and final crack starting there.
for a non failed state and whilst the bending keeps the bar in the elastic realm (which won't be for the smaller radiuses common in reinforced concrete reinforcement). leonhardt gives the stress from bending to be
sigma=
diameter of the bar x e / diameter of the coil to axis
adding this (or the plastified stress properly derived) to the tensile give the initial status.
when you start to pull the buildup of stresses is bigger then at tangency point since inwards some bend friction must be forcing the allocation of axial deformation to a small longitude right there, where rupture happens.
leonhardt says that under 20 bar diameter radius for the bent part the capacity is lesser than for the straight bar in about 2 or 3%.
thanks for your reply!
i assume that to bend the bar into the type of radius i need (a 5/8" diameter bar with a 5.5" outer diameter) the bar would need to yield and there would be the added bonus of now having residual stresses in the bar prior to loading it with the weight of the concrete piece.
anyone have any info on how to account for the residual stresses that exist in the bar after bending? in the end, i want to establish a safe working load for these bars so i am a bit lost right now!
karlt
will take a whole length of bar equal to diameter multiplied by pi, this d·pi is the initial common length of all fibers.
after bending, the cog fiber will still have such length. bur not the outer and inner fibers. the outer, for example, will have (with some approximation) (d+d)·pi length, where d stands for the diameter of the bar. hence, the total elongation at the outer fiber is d·pi, to be distributed along the total length of the cog circumference.
hence, epsilon=d·pi/d·pi=d/d
for your numbers d=4.88 in, d=5/8 in
epsilon=0.13
since you attain yield at 0.002 strain you see that almost the entire depth of your bent bar is entirely yielded, and assuming so won't introduce but a very small error.
by the way 0.13 strain is one that only true ductile steels will see without rupture. for nonductile no heated whilst bending you may break them.
then half of your bent bar is yielded in compression. this is true for the entire curved part but there needs be a transition zone with locked stresses of some kind towards the straight, unbent part, which has not been subject to plastic curvature.
introduction of the load first will diminish the compressive stress whilst remodelling the locked stresses near the tangency point in the outer half to equilibrate part your pull with the tensile stresses already present there. the process continues by annullating the compression in the inner part then going itself to full yielded in tension.
and leonhardt says that if well anchored say 97% of a·fy is attained.
thanks again ishvaaag!
i am bending a 15m grade 400w bar(400 mpa yield, weldable low carbon steel in canada)into a u-shape. the area of rebar steel per 15m bar is assumed to be 200 mm^2. (i know that it generally isn't a great idea to use rebar for lifting due to embrittlement, but we are using weldable steel so the carbon content should be lower)
based on what you write above, the maximum ultimate load i can get out of one bent bar is equal to:
0.97*a*fy*(phi factor) = 0.97*200*400*0.85/1000 = 66kn = 294 kips of load.
does this mean that i can then pick up a load of 2*(294 kips)/(appropriate safey factor), assuming the rebar is developed in the concrete enough to yield?
out of curiousity, wouldn't the curve in the bar tend to straighten out as the load increased and form three plastic hinges at failure? (one at the middle of the bend where the load is applied, and one at the junction of the straight and curved portions of the bar) does the 0.97*a*fy account for this?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
residual stresses huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 06:23 PM
residual stress in bent steel huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 06:22 PM
bent longintudinal shear reinforcement , 9aci 11.5.4.20 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:34 PM
bent bar identification huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:33 PM
国家标准全文数据库系统-机械卷 共计 3143 个标准 taobao American standards 0 2009-04-26 08:55 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:30 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多