几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 02:58 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 o cut or not to cut 9vertical reinf0

to cut or not to cut (vertical reinf)
i'm working on a foundation modification to fit a new piece of equipment. it's a bending unit for a caster in a steel mill. about 6 ft of the pedestal base will be removed and 3 ft of it will be recast. i have advised for selective demolition that will keep the perimeter "vertical" bars (#6@12) intact and to be re-cast in the new pedestal. our sales safe want to cut all the bars and dowel in with adhesive/epoxy dowels, which will save construction time and costs.
is it worth it to keep the original bars continuous?
is doweling equvilent from an engineering point of view?
thanks for you thoughts.
ironmon.
check out our whitepaper library.
ironmon,
you are not asking for the impossible, but you are asking for the most expensive.
yes, in most situations, you can dowel and epoxy bars in. you have to embed the bars enough to develop the reinforcing if there is a moment. i wouldn't use just any type of epoxy. specify hilti re500 (or approved equal).

chip
if this is vibrating machinery, i would imagine the original bars would be better under fatigue loading than epoxy bars.check with the manufacturer.
also with all those existing bars in the pedestal it wont be as easy as they think to drill a hole. it certainly will not be in the corners (the existing bars are already there!)
other option is to retain approx 12" of bar and use a suitable mechanical splice.
why cut off bars that you know are reliably anchored and install more bars that depend highly on workmanship and require a lot of inspection? sounds to me as if your sales staff should stick to selling. in work like this, the concrete work is such a small component compared to the cost of the machinery, i think any such consideration is false economy and foolish.
quote:
specify hilti re500 (or approved equal)
500 is good stuff. the problem i find is that most builders will just use 150 unless you make sure.
thanks, everyone
my thoughts exactly hokie66, i made the same points, and i'm sticking to my guns!
if the client demands epoxy dowels, then i will consider the re500 or others, but i'd rather use that as a backup position.
thanks again.
ironmon
i just noted that it will be in a steel mill.
epoxies perform very poorly under heat, if this is anywhere near any heat then epoxies will be inappropriate.
even if it is not how do you know that they arent going to build something in the future.
another good point csd72, which makes keeping the original bars intact, a better approach.
thanks
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
cut double tee stem huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:17 PM
cut an existing prestressed beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:17 PM
questions on connector cut ou huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 12:32 PM
【转帖】questions on connector cut ou yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:38 PM
【转帖】Gaussian Filter huangyhg 滤波 0 2009-04-13 10:09 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:24 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多