几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 06:23 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 vertical vessel foundation design

vertical vessel foundation design
i am designing the foundation for a vertical storage tank. it's a sizeable tank. i am being asked to design a foundation where the tank is supported directly on the pile cap? i am not sure i understand the function of the pedestal separate from the footing/pile cap. all designs i have done for vertical vessels included an octagonal pedestal with a sqaure or octagonal footing.
additionally, what is the reason for not extending the anchor bolts into the footing?

check out our whitepaper library.
not enough information.
the tank is 45ft tall with an od = 11'-11". it is being designed for an oil and gas plant in wyoming. i am not sure what the design wind speed or eq loads are yet. it will be supported on either steel h piles or helical piles.

i mean the details at the foundation level. what anchor bolts are you talking about? a sketch would help. pedestal? pile cap? what do they look like?
it hasnt been designed yet. i have been asked to design the foundation without a pedestal. so i am trying to understand the use of a pedestal versus designing a foundation without a pedestal. i understand how to design the foundation. i do not know how to make a professional assesment to design a foundtion with a pedestal or to design a foundation without a pedestal.
the pip standard for vertical vessel foundation design includes a statement about it being preferrable to design the pedestal deep enough to contain the anchor bolts and to keep them out of the footing. that was my question in regards to anchor bolts.
if the soil is good and/or overturning loads are small, the footing may need to be only the size of the tank (perhaps about 14' square, circular, or octagonal in your example).
if the soil is poor and/or the overturning loads are high, the footing may need to be significantly larger than the tank. in that case, a pedestal (the size of the tank) resting on the footing would be a more efficient design. if the footing is much wider than the tank's diameter, footing thickness may need to be increased to ensure that foundation is stiff enough for loads to be uniformly distributed to the soil/piles.
perhaps other reasons, but i have used the above criteria often.
a couple of reasons to keep the anchor bolts out of the footing in the case you describe are to simplify the placement and to allow shorter anchor bolts. you need to hold a fairly tight tolerance on bolt placement at the top, and that gets harder if the bolts are sticking 10' up in the air. it might also help avoid interference at the bottom.
a lot of foundations for tanks of those dimensions will just be single slabs of whatever diameter required. a pedestal would be used where there is a significant savings in concrete over a single slab of the same total thickness. but it complicates design, detailing, and forming.
usually, if the tank is supported on the mat or pile cap, i place the anchor rods directly in the concrete. i use sleeved anchors to allow a bit of flexibility in placement and call for the sleeves to be grouted after placement.
if the tank is supported by legs, i put the rods in a pedestal to keep the anchor rods out of muck.
one more thing you need to consider is containment. if the vessel ruptures, your walls have to be high enough to contain the full volume of the tanks contents.
as far as being preferable to place the rods in a pedestal instead of the footing, think about the accuracy required for placing the rods in a large mat with little tolerance for error versus placing the rods in a much smaller pedestal with the same tolerance for error.
thank you for the input. this answers my questions and will be very helpful for my design.
a pedestal isn't inherrently required. even when present, it is not uncommon for the anchor rods to extend down into the foundation slab.
the main reasons why i can see to avoid the placement of the anchor rods in the slab are related to constructability. i agree with most of what chipb says regarding the use of sleeved anchor and the tolerance issues with placement of the rods.
one other thing about the present of a pedestal.... it increases the punching shear perimeter of the vessel. probably more of an issue with a tall vessel rather than a short / squat tank. but, worth mentioning.
josh
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
pre-engineered metal building engineer sse or ser huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 02:08 PM
in a design and built contract,i ha huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:16 PM
foundation design of a sign to handle windload huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:27 PM
foundation design for settlemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:27 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:39 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多