几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 06:59 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 warehouse concrete slab on grade contract join

warehouse concrete slab on grade contract joint
for a warehouse slab foundation (200'x 90'), the columns are on the perimeter. the foundation will be 6" slab with 24"x36" perimeter beam.
the slab will be reinforced with #6 @ 12" oc both way with no contact joint. is this a good option? or it would be better to design contact joint with less reinforcement?
sorry, there is a typo. contraction joints - not contact joints.
are there storage racks sitting on the floor that will deliver point loads to the slab? if so, you will need to check the slab for this loading.
if there are no storage racks, and assuming proper sub-base prepartation, #6@12" o.c.e.w., properly chaired to approximately 2" below the finish floor elevations, should ensure that any cracks (and there will be some) will remain 'tight'.
as a general rule, we find that if we keep as to at least 0.5% of the area of concrete, concrete joints will stay tight.
if you have a contractor on board, you may want to discuss if he is comfortable with pouring this size of floor without joints. this is a decent size area, and it will take coordination to get the concrete trucks to coordinate their arrivals properly. not impossible, larger pours are done all the time, but still needs to be thought out before hand.
if you are ok with cracking every 15 ft or so in the slab then don't worry about contraction joints. usually, people like to locate where they would like the cracks to go and place tooled joints there.
if desired, do a volume change calculation on your slab. for 200' you will probably have around 2" of crack widths from one end to the other.
one product you don't hear too much about any more is the use of expansive cement in concrete floor mixes. they were "popular" back in the mid 70's to mid 80's. i worked on a food plant where the warehouse slab was poured with "chem-comp" additive and there where construction joints only at the pour stops and no diamonds around the columns. the concrete was poured right up around the columns, 10,000 sf at a time, which at that time was about four times the "normal" floor pour size. the one draw back is the higher percentage of steel required in the floor slab.
just a thought!
thanks for all your answer.
the owner asked me not to worry about the storage stack force or forklift. he want to save the cost of construction. that's the reason i try to eliminate the joint. i understand without the contract joints, even with continuous reinforcement, the minor random cracks will still develop.
there are interior columns, but are located inside the mezzanine area. for this area, i use 4" slab with thicken slab for the load bearing from columns. is a construction joint need for the connection between 4" and 6" concrete slab?
it will crack. have the owner sign off that he acknowledges that this will happen.
storage racks and forktruck traffic subject the floor slab to negative moments and high concentrated loadings. without reinforcing, the slab will crack. get a good floor slab design reference, like the book from aberdeen publishers by ringo and do it right the first time!
the owner told me that this is a light duty warehouse. but i still check the slab for 250 psf live load with staad/pro. the reinforcement has plenty capacity. actually most area only required minimum reinf requirement.

your owner is an idiot if he thinks that elimiating the joints is cheaper than labor and cost to place the #6@12 o.c.
if its light duty, save your money on reinforcing, add control(crack) joints, and be done. we have done many a slab on grade with no reinforing, and not had problems. we did 6" all the time. im sure that 18,000 sq. ft. of buying and placing rebar is far more expensive than a finisher with a saw.
also, without the rebar, you can get a laser screed in the building, and not have to leave strips out for it, giving you a superior finish.
construction joints at intervals can alleviate the shrinkage cracks and act as contraction joints. place concrete in alternate strips, from 0 - 20', 40' - 60', 80' - 100', and so on in a first placement. come back and fill in the gaps days later to minimize the shrinkage overall.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
slab-on-grade w embedded rails huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:30 PM
slab on grade problem huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:24 PM
how to thicken an existing concrete slab on grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:54 PM
crack in old floor slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:20 PM
concrete spec. for slab-on-grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:49 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:01 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多