几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-04, 05:43 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 datum pattern callouts

datum pattern callouts
i have a part drawing that contains 6 sheets.
a pattern of 2 holes is called out as datum b on sheet 1.
i need to identify datum b on the other sheets, but it's not necessary to callout the size of the holes. what is the proper way to do this (if there is a proper way)?
do i need to callout the hole sizes every time?
would it be ok to have a leader with "2x" and datum b identifier attached to the leader?
find a job or post a job opening
do you really need to identify the datum on other sheets? that being said, as i do not think this is covered by the standard, i would just create a note pointing to one of the holes stating "hole pattern" and put the datum symbol on the leader.
peter stockhausen
senior design analyst (checker)
infotech aerospace services
jlang, your suggestion is probably technically correct, adding "hole pattern" per peter might clarify it.
do you really have to repeat the datum id? i know we often do it for clarity and it's ok to do it, but in your case it seems it might make it more confusing.
kenat,
if a datum is referenced, should that datum be fully defined (in this case hole size, size tol, gd&t) on the same sheet? or is it ok to have to look back at an earlier sheet?
in my case i have datum b fully defined on sheet 1, but the other sheets have features that reference datum b. so my plan was to identify datum b on every sheet, but only have it fully defined on sheet 1. i figured this would keep things clear without redundantly defining the datum.
jlang, i dont' have the standard to hand but i don't believe there's an explicit requirement to repeat the datum on each sheet.
normally we probably would repeat it on a second sheet to make it easier to read, but as i say, in your case it might add to confusion.
i certainly wouldn't expect it should be redefined as this requires double dimensioning.
kenat,
no, you do not have to redefine the datum to use it again. that would be double dimensioning, unless reference dimensions were used, and that would only serve to clutter the drawing and would not make the drawing any easier to read. to prevent confusion, you can add reference information about the datum feature (such as diameter), but it is not required.
good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor."fff"> - robert hunter

promoting, selling, recruiting and student posting
are not allowed in the forums.
(add stickiness to your site by linking to this professionally managed technical forum)
title: drafting standards,
description: drafting standards, gd&t & tolerance analysis technical support forum and mutual help system for engineering professionals. selling and recruiting forbidden.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
datum definition, pattern of holes huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:40 PM
【转帖】hatching entities yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 12:01 PM
【转帖】a hatch problem yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-04 03:07 PM
【转帖】ordinate dimensions to define gdt datum structure yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:04 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:03 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多