几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 09:09 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 a really tall one in chicago

a really tall one in chicago
proposed 150 story tower in chicago:
re "digging a six-and-a-half-story hole at the mouth of the chicago river to make way for an underground garage and loading dock. experts say that would be the deepest lakefront building excavation in the city."
doesn't chicago have enough experience with flooded basements alongside the chicago river?!?
some people learn r-e-a-l slow.
mike halloran
pembroke pines, fl, usa
i like the part about pending city approval. to me the building looks out of place with the rest of the sky line. if i was on the approval commitee i would ask for a redesign more in keeping with the character of the city.
looks like it'd be out of place anywhere outside of disneyland
someone has to be first.
rarswc,
what is the character of the city? all the tall buildings in the photograph look different from each other anyway!
the first skyscraper would not have fitted the character of the city either.
with that barber pole striping, it would be chicago's version of the cape hatteras lighthouse!
when the john hancock center or the sears towers were built, they did not resemble the character of the city. but still, i am dubious about this types of buildings projects. i think there's glory for engineers and architects doing much smaller and simpler buildings. and the nicest part is that it is only them who really know about it.
a technical 2 cents, on the other side, is that, speaking of perimeter steel columns, the dark building that you see on the right side of the tower in question, has had problems with settlement.
and we mustn't forget that frank lloyd wright proposed a mile high skyscraper for chicago.
is this on the same site as the 1,360 ft. trump international hotel & tower proposed in 2005?
this story gives depth to the limestone bedrock as 110 feet. the earlier design involved drilling keyholes into bedrock & then filling 10 ft.-diameter shafts 80 feet long with 10,000 psi concrete to support a 10 ft thick concrete mat foundation 35 feet subgrade.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
42 tall cmu firewall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:47 AM
30 ft. tall urm veneer wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:38 AM
2007 chicago building code huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:31 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:53 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多