几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 01:00 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 asce 7 wind torsion loads

asce 7 wind torsion loads
are there any examples of how to apply the torsion loads to complex floor plans of 2 and 3 story residences? would it be acceptable to break up complex plans into rectangular diaphragms and apply the torsion load to each diaphragm separately?
thanks
the asce wind calculations were set up to be used for what they define as regular buildings. so i doubt you will find published examples showing how to apply wind torsion on odd shaped buildings.
if the plan is very complex, then you should recommend the owner pay for a wind tunnel test to be done since this is what asce stipulates for irregular buildings. the reality is i think that a lot of engineers doing small buildings (small construction budgets) use conservative judgment estimates on complex plans by breaking them into "regular" looking pieces and then applying the asce wind the best they can. this saves the owner from paying for a wind tunnel test and makes sure the project stays in their office, but is not the right thing to do according to asce7.
since you are dealing with residences, i doubt a wind tunnel test is ever done since residences usually don't even have engineers on them to begin with. good luck
insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.
-friedrich nietzsche
there are specific tosional requirements for buildings taller than 60 feet. less than 60 feet, the engineer needs to apply his own judgement.
it still may be an irregular building.
insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.
-friedrich nietzsche
jike
with asce 7-02 you have to look at torsional loading for buildings of all heights, asce 7-98 required it on building greater than 60 ft in height. at least that how i read it.
a good book to get is the "design of buildings and bridges for wind" by simiu and miyata. it actually does a typical torsion problem and clarifies all the asce mistakes and conflicts in the new asce 2005 code. good luck.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
asce 7 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:59 PM
asce 37-02 construction wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:55 PM
asce 17-96 para. 4.2.5 load combinations seiasce 7-02 com huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:54 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM
1997 ubc wind loads for components huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:51 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:32 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多