几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 01:11 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 asce 7-05 section 12.2.5.5

asce 7-05 section 12.2.5.5
folks,
please see attached sketch.
i have a clerestory popup roof to which my concrete shear walls do not continue. i have a dicontinuous vertical system.
i need to use smf because of my seismic design category. however, does section 12.2.5.5 require me to continue it to the foundation even if i can adequately transfer the shear forces via the diaphragm to the concrete shear walls? this would be very costly to carry my moment frames all the way down just because they support a light roof.
are there any ways to use the diaphragm to transfer the shear to the walls and carry it to the foundation without violating the code?
thanks
i agree that i do not think the intent of the code is to require a clerestory lateral system to be continued to the foundation. you would have to increase the lateral forces for the increase according to the out-of-plane offset horizontal irregularity requirements of table 12.3-1. are you required to do special moment frames due to building height in sdc d-f??
yes, i am required to do it because of the sdc which happens to be "d" and because of the height > 35'.
any clarification regarding code interpretation is much appreciated.
i've honestly never run into this particular scenario but you could argue that the clerestory is a single-story moment frame system which, as long as your building height is less than 65', would allow you to utilize ordinary or intermediate moment frames. this would preclude the special moment frame requirement and would allow you to waive the continuous to the foundation requirement of 12.2.5.5. i'm not sure if that is truly accurate, just a thought.
i'm no expert on high seismic design. but, i think it all depends on whether a smf is required or not. 12.2.5.5 clearly states that if it is required then it must be continuous to the foundation. if not you must meet 12.3.3.2 & 12.3.3.4. however, i don't think section 12.2.5.5 addresses the fact that it smf is offset from the shear walls at the lower levels.
again i am no expert on irregularities, but i think you have both vertical and horizontal irregularities.
i am using a higher method of analysis rsa, in addition to designing them for higher forces as required.
i am just questioning the requirement for carrying a smf all the way down to the foundation inlieu of transferring them to a shear wall.
i live in miami and i don't do seismic design on a daily basis, and hence my question to the people who do this day in and day out.
thanks
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
asce 17-96 para. 4.2.5 load combinations seiasce 7-02 com huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:54 PM
section of a section huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 12:48 PM
【转帖】section of a section yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:53 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM
Ug术语中英对照表cad部分 topology UG二次开发 1 2007-02-13 11:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:54 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多