几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 01:07 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 footing reinforcemen

footing reinforcement
is it necessary to provide additional steel perpendicular to the primary steel in a shallow footing? what section of the code pertains to this?
if the anchor bolt embeddment is sufficient for the tension load based on the failure modes per app d of the aci 318-05, is additional steel required?

in a spread footing, there is no "primary steel" - there is bending in both directions, therefore you need "primary steel" in both directions.
for a wall footing, where you only have bending steel in the transverse direction, you should still provide longitudinal steel for t&s. this will also help the footing "span" over any soft spots that may be present.
my reference to primary steel was for bending. there is steel in both directions to account for bending. my question was referring to steel perpendicular to the steel for bending. the footing is 18 deep with anchor bolts embedded 8".
oh, you mean steel that is parallel to the depth of the footing? there are only two reasons you would need that:
1.) shear reinforcement for the ftg - this is never done, just size the thickness so you don't need it.
2.) to develop anchor rods. if you're meeting all the requirements of app. d and it works for strength, then you don't need steel parallel to the anchor rods.
these steel is only required for punching shear in footing (if thickness of concrete is not enough & you can't increase the thickness for some reason).
so in this case you should provide steel parallel to depth of footing.
but anchor bolt is only used for tension and you should provide enough depth of concrete to make the anchor bolt effect.
do we have any code that state using steel parallel to anchor bolts?
engmarami-
app. d allows you to use rebar to develop the anchor rods in lieu of designing for the concrete breakout capacity. you still have to check the other failure modes - pullout, steel capacity, and side face blowout (if applicable) - but you can get out of the concrete breakout check by providing adequate reinforcement. you need to properly develop the rebar with the anchor rods, but it does come in handy - especially if you have some high moments or uplifts that land on piers and your concrete breakout cone is small.
thank you structuraleit for your guidance.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
footing is too small for residential addition1 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:04 PM
differential settlement of spread footing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:46 PM
demolition of existing wall footing to install column huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:07 PM
can use steel beams instead of rebar for my reinforcemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:25 PM
anchor for concrete footing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:56 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:54 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多