几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 02:20 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 gambrel truss joint mathmatical solution

gambrel truss joint mathmatical solution
i am in the process of designing a shed with a gambrel roof with little to no webbing utilizing wood plates to attach the joints to maximize my storage space. i have learned that when the joints are not coincident the soulution is not unique. my question is how are these types of trusses analyzed? are there other ways to get a solution with confidence if indeterminant ? below is the apporximate shape (diagram is not displayed well)

><
> <
> <
/ \
/ \
/ \
/__________________\
i see these types of truss designs at a local home depot with the joints connected by steel plates with little to no triangulation and would like to use this design, however i would like to learn from it and not just wing the design.
gambrel roofs have been discussed a few times, there is almost nothing on the web about them.
also i still have the document "designing barns to withstand wind loads" on my website (link below). it will not answer your question but does have some (1930's) info on gambrel roofs.
thanks slideruleera.
i was looking through "designing barns to withstand wind loads" and noticed the complexity of the joints. it appears that when designing the joints, pre fea, each triangle is analyzed separately and then assembled as a whole with many assumptions.
in my design, using only a plate to assemble the joint mimics a triangle with some amount of bending resistance required. this type of design appears to be a truss and a beam combination without knowing what percentage of each it is acting like. the amount of bending resistance needed is what concerns me. might you have any info on moment transfer of wood joints using nails or nails and glue? i actually joined a couple of 2x6's together to form an 8' long beam with 3/4" wood plates on both sides. i made two samples varying the number of nails but keeping the spacing the same. from memory the nails were 8d common (.162" dia.) and just penetrated all the
sm69 - i do have a few leads that may be helpful:
"mechanical connections in wood structures"
thanks slideruleera. good info
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
fundamental truss question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 02:11 PM
difference between a construction joint and an expansion joi huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:40 PM
contraction joint for slab on grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:41 PM
cfs truss specified by eor huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:18 PM
building expansion joint or no huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:37 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:56 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多