几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 11:18 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 loading for helipad on building

loading for helipad on building
does anyone know anything regarding this or any references which can guide me as to what i should anticipate for loading from a helipad on a building. i know i should account for the weight of the helicopter, but also i imagine there should be both upward and downward wind forces plus some additional dynamic loading from landing... including possible "rough" landings.
i'm hoping theres just a psf value for both downforce and uplift...
thanks!
tyler

well, a quick yahoo search revealed many useful links. you should try that.
here are a few:
thanks! the 5390-2b.pdf is really useful!
do a google search on this forum and you will find this question has been posted previously.
in the third link on page 12 i noticed that in the interior circle of the landing pad the weight limit of the pad structure is to be posted. to me that implies that the design load should be the weight of the choopper that could be expected to land there. that will take some coordination with the client.
in addition, i would not use less than 25% impact and 10% lateral load during landing - similar to crane loads.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
didn't even know you could do that... i'll be using that more in the future instead of just posting first. sorry bout that!
so basically what i am doing is i have this existing building that was grossly overdesigned in anticipation of heavy mechanical loading and roof garden areas that were never placed and now they are considering possibly placing a helipad instead...
they want to know if its possible to do without any structural changes. i don't think it's going to fly-no pun intended , but i thought i'd take a look into it.
the existing structure might be able to support the static loads, but i'm really more concerned about deflection problems and those pesky impact and dynamic loads...
thanks!
tyler
to avoid the impact loads, just don't allow the chopper to set down...
mike mccann
mmc engineering
the total load will remain constant with the concentrated load able to load any fraction of the pad. helicopters are usually relatively light, (less than 15 kips for the big single rotor ones).
we did one similar to yours about two years ago. we built a steel and aluminum frame on top of an existing old steel framed building. we accounted for 1.5 times the weight of the helicopter applied as point load, line load and as a pressure. remember, the wind pressure generated at landing and take-off is only slightly greater than that needed to counteract the weight of the helicopter.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
ibc wind load on a square building huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:58 PM
glazing in non-windbourne debris areas huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 02:42 PM
fibermesh metal building huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 11:38 AM
asce 7-05 open building gable wind loading huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:08 PM
allowable high rise building drif huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:58 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:46 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多