huangyhg

replacing existing bolts in a brace
in aisc's design guide 15 for retrofit of existing structures, it states, "in all types of riveted and bolted connections, old rivets or common (a307) bolts can be removed and replaced with a325 or a490 bolts."
my question is whether anyone has a problem with doing this "hot," i.e. replacing the bolts one by one without unloading the connection. this is a chevron brace in an industrial structure with a large piece of equipment near the top of the chevron - essentially these braces are currently loaded as columns.
if you "heard" it on the internet, it's guilty until proven innocent. - dcs
i wouldn't want to replace the bolts while equipment is in operation. and replacing them without temporary shoring would depend on the loads taken by the bolts and the quantity of bolts in a connection. for instance, with 6 bolts, i would not worry about replacing them one at a time. with 4 or less, i would want to be sure of the loads.
hokie66, i dont understand your logic...if 6 bolts are loaded to 95% you would replace 1 at a time, but if 4 bolts are loaded to 95% you wouldnt? is this beacause of load sharing?
he is limiting the potential overstress in the existing bolts during replacement.
1 out of 6 = 17%
1 out of 4 = 25%

ok, thats a good point. thanks
there's 16 bolts per connection (the brace is a wide flange w/claw angles), so i'm not worried about overstress. the biggest issue is that we wouldn't do it in a hurricane, which is what this connection was designed for in addition to the vessel.
i was just curious to see if anybody had seen some research on hot-swapping bolts like this. i know they hot-swap bolts on piping flanges all the time, but structurally speaking this is a different loading condition.
if you "heard" it on the internet, it's guilty until proven innocent. - dcs
swearingen,
i don't recall ever seeing any guidance for replacing bolts. in your situation, i think it just comes down to judgment, and with 16 bolts per connection, i would just do it. but i still believe your question is a good one.
if it was me, i'd require an inspection company to be present during the "hot-swapping" to witness that a single bolt is removed and replaced at a time.
you could get an antsy contractor who wants to move quicker and end up giving you problems.....just my thoughts.
rc
all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
edmund burke

dont do it, props are cheap insurance.
swearingen,
i have replaced rivets by bolts on an old bridge. as some other people has said, done carefully, and if enough rivets are left in place to ensure the stability of the
another question popped up: what order would you replace them? our general thinking was to start from the center of the connection and alternate bolts out to each extent of the connection.
also, these are chevrons with a 345k point load on the beam above at the point of the chevron. it is clear that the

__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]