几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 02:57 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ji end reaction

tji end reaction
i am trying to determine the design assumptions which limit the end reactions on a tji joist.
the confusion for me lies when comparing intermediate allowable reactions and end reactions.
tia

i think the difference is that at the ends, you have a terminated web end that can buckle more easily than within the span.

jae,
would you happen to know the design check for this?
out of curiousity, i just ran a continuous joist with point load near the end (using tj-beam). as end bearing the joist failed in end reaction. i then assumed 2x4 support wall and cantilevered the joist 2" over and the joist worked fine.
this little experiment in this case is going to save $8,000 on my project.
i don't know the formulaic check - attached is a georgia pacific data sheet what includes end bearings along with notes about bearing lengths, end/intermediate reactions, and what to do about them.

thanks jae,
the notes for end reaction made much more sense to me. the note saying for 4" bearing or greater set the end reaction to max. shear.
i have another reason for this post. i am sure others have encountered what i have regarding floor systems being redesigned by lumber suppliers. in a nutshell i have had numerous times where our design would be scrutinized and redesigned by the supplier. this last time was a set of shop drawings with tji doubled in lieu of singles. the response from the supplier was our design was flawed and their program told them doubles were required. i requested the calcs and reviewed.
1) end bearing input was 3" with a rimboard (1.88" effective). joists bear on 2x8 plate.
2) higher loads then required.
using their loads and the cantilever approach i mentioned the joists work within their software. using the intended loads the joists work either way.
i feel this is a problem in our industry regarding the suppliers of trusses, joists, etc. designing buildings using software they do not understand and with limited engineering knowledge.

i raised a similair question in the past with lp. the answer was very involved, so i concluded it was easier to just follow the guidelines and limitations listed in their catalog.
there is a lot of information here on bearing design and stiffeners.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
抛砖引玉 yang686526 ObjectARX(VB.NET/C#) 0 2009-04-21 02:07 PM
【转帖】[原创]曲线打断于交点 yang686526 ObjectARX(VB.NET/C#) 0 2009-04-20 03:19 PM
【转帖】dll学习(资料收集) huangyhg vc编程 0 2008-05-17 09:24 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:04 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多