huangyhg

when to not use composite steel
whenever i go through a costing exercise for a concrete deck over steel framing system (joists / beams), it seems as though composite steel beams always come out on top. the system is shallower, the tonnage is reduced, vibration characteristics are improved... fire protection issues seem to push the pendulum even further in the direction of composite steel beams.
so my question is this: should all steel beams be composite beams when there's a suitable topping slab above? is there any simple span deck slab / beam framing situation in which it would make more sense to use non-composite steel framing?
thanks.
check out our whitepaper library.
i have heard that there needs to be enough studs on the job to make the setup of the stud welding machine worth it. we have found non-composite systems with joists to be cheaper for a lot of two story steel structures with small footprints.

hmmm... got any idea what that "critical mass" number of studs would be? that argument might be especially valid here as we are just using the system for a moderate sized, one story mezzanine.
we've been contemplating joists for this application too. i'm concerned about the vibration characterisics however.
try calling aisc - they have a department that helps engineers with preliminary framing concepts. they might have some idea of number of studs, spans, etc. where composite kicks in as more economical.

is it true that vibrations are improved? doesn't dg # 11 recommend using composite properties even if the beams aren't composite because the friction is enough to get composite action for the load under consideration when doing vibration checks?
i am interested to hear the results of this "poll".
yes, that is exactly what dg #11 says. in addition to friction, they cite the roughness of screws / puddle welds etc. numerically -- by dg #11 -- there is no improvement. i guess i was expecting that there would be some improvement in the finished product however.
i saw someone on here say that 1000 studs was a good number to keep as a rule of thumb (i.e. if going composite yields less than 1000 studs on the job, then is better to stick with non-composite).
abusementpark:
yes, 1,000 studs is a good round number to consider when deciding on whether or use composite steel or not.
i have had converstations with one of the owners of a local steel erection company (who also used to be a practicing structural engineer) and its his opinion, through looking at the costs of raw material, fabrication, and erection, that somewhere between 750 and 1,000 studs is where the material saving of using composite beams begins to overcome the cost of setting up the stud welding machine and calibrating it at each job site. i forget what he says he figures into a bid for setting up and calibrating the welder, but i do re
do they all use the stud welding machines nowadays?
based on personal experience on two projects, not my own, the composite system is more flexible with respect to vibration issues. the reason we use a composite system is to reduce the amount of steel used for the beams. that reduces the stiffness of the system, which is required to reduce vibration issues. for offices where we had full height partitions to dampen the vibrations, the reduced stiffness was not a problem. for offices where we have modular furniture systems that do not provide the damping, the reduced stiffness is a problem. i've worked with two owners who have buildings constructed using composite floor systems and neither met dg 11 criteria for an office/walking criteria even though the composite floor framing was met stress requirements and were within acceptable deflection criteria.
the type of structures that i design rarely have sufficient repetition for it to make much difference in material.
what i look for is simplicity, whatever system has the simplest erection procedure is generally the one i choose as up to two thirds of the cost is in the non material costs.
there are a few areas where i would definately not use composite beams - those areas where propping is difficult and you would need to use unpropped beams and those buildings where it is very likely that additional openings will be required.

__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]